sufandu
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 15,106
- Like
- 23,816
Yeah. The decoy stuff worked early to get Shrader some space to run. In the second half they weren't falling for it anymore.I actually think Clemson figured that out.
Yeah. The decoy stuff worked early to get Shrader some space to run. In the second half they weren't falling for it anymore.I actually think Clemson figured that out.
The staff seems to play who they can trust. When Wison came in earlier this year when Shrader had his helmet come off, the didn't hesitate to call passes for Wison cold off the bench. They don't trust the other RBs to be productive.He averaged over 10 yards per carry.
But he did call to come out. And he did call to come out last year on some key 3rd downs as well.
We should be rotating at the RB position throughout the game, and make sure Tucker is fresh for the key situations. It's a Dino philosophy that a RB who is "on" should play the whole game, but this, like his 2 minute decision strategy, should be retired.
That's just it. The coaches don't think they're serviceable. If they did, they'd use them. Has Price seen action on offense outside of the Wagner game?We were up 14 and had 4 turnovers go our way. We need to run the ball. If he’s hurt, have Allen or Price run it. They’re more than serviceable.
Nobody is arging against that. The coaches don't think Tucker's backups could do that against Clemson. And they haven't played them much through most of games. They see them in practice everyday. I don't think RB is like QB where rhe starter takes way more practice reps than the back up. They must see something in practice that keeps them from having confidence in the back ups.At the end of the day, we didn't need a ton of production. Even getting an average of one first down a drive and taking the maximum amount of time off the clock would have been big. 2-3 yard runs on first and second downs to keep the chains manageable on third down would have been big.
I said it in another thread. If he’s that hurt then they need to start running Allen/Price more. We became one dimensional. It’s almost like Tucker has a clause in his scholarship that says another Cuse RB can’t get more than five snaps a game whether or not he’s 100%. I love Tucker, but the entire situation is mind boggling and frustrating.Think he's still banged up and we were always playing him as the decoy. Was odd when Allen came in early on and he didn't get many touches after that.
What is the evidence that he is banged up (presumably more than average for any player)? This seems like speculation to me.Correct. He’s banged up and it’s obvious. And he’s better banged up than his backups, because, get this, he’s one of the top 5 RB’s in college football.
We aren’t Alabama and we don’t have that depth. So some of the commentary I see is mind numbing.
Pulling himself out of the game multiple times and wincing seems to be pretty good evidence of that along with having his thigh wrapped.What is the evidence that he is banged up (presumably more than average for any player)? This seems like speculation to me.
Pulling himself out of the game multiple times and wincing seems to be pretty good evidence of that along with having his thigh wrapped.
But I’m not a doctor so what do I know.
The penalties were a result of a spent teamThis is not a response to anyone on this topic, just an observation. Looked to me like both our offensive and defensive lines ran out of gas in the second half. Because of that, in the second half we struggled to run well or pass block in order to give Shrader adequate time to pass. And of course they put a spy on Shrader. And we got some very untimely (and yes questionable) penalties.
And on defense, in the second half our line was also out of gas and struggled to stop the run. We were probably quality depth on our lines away from beating them. This is not a knock on our lines though, they played their hearts out. The whole team did.
I will say this. I sit towards the top of the 1st level behind the SU bench at around the 20 yard line. I have been convinced Tucker has been dealing with an injury (or at least significant pain since Louisville). I was assuming it was a hip pointer but I may be wrong.Pulling himself out of the game multiple times and wincing seems to be pretty good evidence of that along with having his thigh wrapped.
But I’m not a doctor so what do I know.
Some of them were. Running out of gas doesn't explain the stupid head bob Vetterello got called on for the false start or the defensive lineman reaching inside the 2nd string QB's facemask while he's lying on the ground. Some of the penalties remain stupid and lack of attention to detail.The penalties were a result of a spent team
The team ran out of gas.
Not to split hairs but our defense had allot to do with Clemson not playing well. I do agree that for 3 qrtrs if we had taken advantage of opportunity our defense provided we would have won. Heck our defense did things in the 4th that still gave us a chance at winning.Our RBs averaged like 8+ ypc. We couldn't move the ball in the second half. Why weren't they at least trying to run with our RBs?
Clemson handed us this game for 3 quarters, and then we couldn't do anything, so they took it right back.
Agreed.Not to split hairs but our defense had allot to do with Clemson not playing well. I do agree that for 3 qrtrs if we had taken advantage of opportunity our defense provided we would have won. Heck our defense did things in the 4th that still gave us a chance at winning.
Is there something else to the Vett head bob? Because I swear he does that multiple times a game and it isn't always flagged.Some of them were. Running out of gas doesn't explain the stupid head bob Vetterello got called on for the false start or the defensive lineman reaching inside the 2nd string QB's facemask while he's lying on the ground. Some of the penalties remain stupid and lack of attention to detail.
I don't know, but those and the illegal snaps are crazy.Is there something else to the Vett head bob? Because I swear he does that multiple times a game and it isn't always flagged.
Seems ridiculous they could rush 3 or 4, spy Shrader, scheme Tucker AND drop into zone coverage smothering the receivers.Again another observation not pointed at anyone. Seems like Clemsons gameplan keyed on stopping Tucker and Gadsden at all costs. Which is why Shrader had such a good first half running. Then in the second half they put a spy on Shrader to stop him. Which meant that Tucker could have had opportunities but unfortunately by that time our line was too worn down to block effectively and perhaps Tucker was hurt. Definitely a chess match.