you cant control OC records . i think we would have done OK against Vill/USC/Army/New mexico st or nex Mexico/Old dominion/navy/ND or FIU/Old Dominion/WV/uconn at worst we would have been 3-1 probably 4-0 against Marylands schedule.
This is not true. The ACC has a one win rule that is in place regarding bowl game assignments but this applies to conference record only.A 6-6 conference team can't get a bowl if a 7-5 conference team is available...I'm not saying Cuse is out...but it isn't 100%. There aresome scenarios in my mind where either Cuse or Pitt stay home.
If anyone should be left out, it should be Maryland. Screw'em, they're leaving anyway and we beat themThis feels like deja vu the Wagner thread. The NCAA had a rule a conference couldn't send a 6-6 team to a bowl unless all eligible 7-5 teams went. Apparently it changed.
Thanks to tomcat I did some more research. It looks like a 7-5 team could be left home and a 6-6 team could go.
This blog talks a bit about it
http://m.spokesman.com/blogs/sportslink/2013/nov/30/we-always-have-cure/
So with that...Maryland could be left home...I feel a bit better but I'm not 100% convinced we have a bowl yet.
If anyone should be left out, it should be Maryland. Screw'em, they're leaving anyway and we beat them
TexanMark said:This feels like deja vu the Wagner thread. The NCAA had a rule a conference couldn't send a 6-6 team to a bowl unless all eligible 7-5 teams went. Apparently it changed. Thanks to tomcat I did some more research. It looks like a 7-5 team could be left home and a 6-6 team could go. This blog talks a bit about it http://m.spokesman.com/blogs/sportslink/2013/nov/30/we-always-have-cure/ So with that...Maryland could be left home...I feel a bit better but I'm not 100% convinced we have a bowl yet.
A 6-6 conference team can't get a bowl if a 7-5 conference team is available...I'm not saying Cuse is out...but it isn't 100%. There aresome scenarios in my mind where either Cuse or Pitt stay home.
If a team from one of the 5 big conferences is gonna get screwed, I'd be worried if I was Maryland. The ACC isn't going to throw them a lifeline. Nor should they.
Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
hell , our fans were louder at college parkBut Maryland would buy tickets to a bowl game in Annapolis...we'll see.
But Maryland would buy tickets to a bowl game in Annapolis...we'll see.
Hmmm you saw I corrected myself above...I trusted what another guy wrote on another board without checking his source...I was wrong about it. The rule changed.Patently false.
Hmmm you saw I corrected myself above...I trusted what another guy wrote on another board without checking his source...I was wrong about it. The rule changed.
Maryland would be entitled to the same split of net bowl revenues as every other ACC team, even if they didn't play in a bowl. I wouldn't be surprised to see the league withhold their share, pending the outcome of the lawsuit.On the other hand ... the ACC hooks up Maryland with a sweet bowl, and withholds the payment to cover "conference fees".
I would be shocked to see them get a dime.I wouldn't be surprised to see the league withhold their share, pending the outcome of the lawsuit.
If the B1G has an unused bowl slot then that's where they should go.If anyone should be left out, it should be Maryland. Screw'em, they're leaving anyway and we beat them
This article posted last night in the Baltimore Sun talks about the Military Bowl and the ACC slot in it. It looks like Maryland was all set to go there until Syracuse beat BC Saturday. If you read between the lines, it sounds pretty good for the Orangemen.After reading his recent comments about bowl eligibility and his ineptness at his last job, what happens if Frazier (and Gross) muck this up and we don't go bowling? After reading that, my confidence level that we go bowling just dropped big time. Both would need to be fired in my opinion.
This article posted last night in the Baltimore Sun talks about the Military Bowl and the ACC slot in it. It looks like Maryland was all set to go there until Syracuse beat BC Saturday. If you read between the lines, it sounds pretty good for the Orangemen.
Maryland's most likely options remain the Military Bowl (Dec. 27 in Annapolis) and the AdvoCare V100 Bowl (Dec. 31 in Shreveport, La.). Representatives from both bowls have scouted the Terps.
The Military Bowl is too close to campus to be considered an exotic experience for players, but it's favored by many alumni and fans because it would be convenient and inexpensive. Many bowl activities will be held in Washington, D.C.
Maryland's Military Bowl prospects dimmed a bit when Syracuse defeated Boston College on Saturday. The victory made the Orange bowl-eligible, adding another team to the mix and complicating the selection process.
"We're in a great spot," Military Bowl president and executive director Steve Beck said in a text message Sunday. "Of course, we have interest in Maryland and think the Terps would enjoy our game. But we're also looking at our other ACC options and are looking forward to a terrific game. It is a good situation to be in."
Link
I would think the ACC is pushing hard to get Syracuse in this slot. It should be noted that the B1G is taking the other slot in the game effective next year and they are surely doing what they can to get them this bid. But they surely have more leverage with the bowl games they are already affiliated with where there are not enough bowl eligible B1G schools available to fill the slots.
Isn't AdvoCare health products set up along the lines like Amway?The AdvoCare V100 Bowl? Is that some sort of lotion?
But Maryland would buy tickets to a bowl game in Annapolis...we'll see.
hell , our fans were louder at college park
don't play dumb with us. we all know you have a comprehensive knowledge of the lotion marketThe AdvoCare V100 Bowl? Is that some sort of lotion?
Clemson is in line for the orange bowl bid not sugar bowl