cusestudent
2nd String
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 675
- Like
- 116
How is SU's national prestige better than Rutgers and UConn's at this point? UConn was in a BCS bowl, Rutgers has was national sensation in 2006, both have landed draft picks in the first round (something SU hasn't done since 2001). Let me make this clear, SU is an irrelevant team nationally this past decade, which is a lot of what recruits and sponsors put heavy emphasis on. Since 2004, SU has had one winning season with another being .500, UConn has had five along with two conference championships, and Rutgers had six winning seasons with a 5-1 bowl record. If you think both programs do not have more national sway right now then you are blinded by loyalty to SU.Another youngin' with all the answers!
SU is at a point now where they need wins more than anything else. Recruits aren't going to be impressed with playing USC and OU if Cuse is losing by three or more touchdowns, which realistically could happen this year.
HCDM can't sell recruits on the whole "sure we were 6-6, but two of those losses came to USC and OU!" That doesn't work.
Along the same lines, with regards to MetLife games, it will not be good for tri-state (NYC/LI, NJ, CT/Eastern PA, etc..) recruits to see a bloodbath in MetLife. Play USC at the Dome and schedule someone like Penn St or Benedict Arnold or even RU (once SU is in the ACC) at MetLife. SU should schedule teams they have a realistic shot at beating in these games. There is no benefit to getting blown out at a pro stadium 250 miles from your campus. That is not the kind of exposure SU should be looking for.
I also disagree with your national prestige comment. Nationally, SU is still a bigger football name than RU and UConn. Regionally thought you may be right, and this should be concerning. Playing OU, USC, etc...in MetLife Stadium is not going to help this.
The whole point of the NYC games is for SU to be playing against a big name team on a big time stage with a lot of money coming SU's way. The program has to completely rebrand itself; it's time to look to the present and future instead of burying our heads in the past. I'm sorry but no one outside of the program cares about our past and tradition, and that's the simple truth. You are completely wrong about recruits, and by your first comment about me being a young in' I'm guessing you're closer to retirement than to being fresh out of college. You are completely out of touch with today's youth on this. They are all about what you've done RECENTLY and what you can do for them NOW, not what McNabb did nearly twenty years ago or what Ernie Davis did 50 years ago. It's about how many guys have you sent to the NFL in the past few years? How many actually play rather than sit the bench or are on the practice squad? All SU has is the past, it's time to start thinking about the future.