Ron gave up easy fastbreak layups last night and that just can't happen. He is also no threat whatsoever except on the break. On the break he is tremendous in getting the ball where we can score. Otherwise his defender begs him to shoot by packing into the lane. They do the same with Joseph and Roberson. I am not sure opposing team can get any more players packed into the lane in this scenario. Duke did that and how did Rak do? (I am conveniently not talking about the muggings he endured 'cause Duke doesn't foul
).
Why can Cooney let it happen then if it just can't happen? They all make mistakes. It's only fine to highlight the ones that Cooney doesn't make?
Except on the break? He had at least two drives and dishes to Rak in the lane last night in half-court sets. I only see one assist, but maybe Rak was fouled on one. That would probably be more drives into the lane off the bounce with a dish underneath than Cooney has this month.
So, assuming you are right, and once Cooney leaves the court the offense falls apart, how does Rak score and we go on an 8-2 with Cooney on the bench against Pitt. A Pitt team that was on a 7-1 run when Cooney left the floor, and went on an 8-0 run when Cooney returned to the game. That's an actual occurrence - so explain.
I know the Cooney as religion side gets all upset that everyone is insulting him, but I think it's amazing that you all think so little of our subs that you don' think they could spell this kid for a few minutes each game - possibly more. They're not imbeciles walking around drooling on the court. Do they take bad shots? Yep. Do they offer up some skills that TC doesn't? Sure. Do they allow runouts at times? Yup, so does TC. Do they allow penetration at the top of the zone? Cooney does a ton, so, no danger there.
Sh***ing on the back-ups they way you all do is probably more harsh than what is being said about TC, but whatever...
So, again, for fun, how does that happen in the Pitt game? Because all I ever hear in these arguments is, you can't sit Trevor because, well, we simply cannot! Disaster will follow! I have no evidence of this - I just know it's true because he doesn't sit!!! So, when the game doesn't align with your belief (like Pitt), how did it occur? It's perfectly fine to say it's just a fluke. Why did Pitt kill us before and after TC went out though? It's all very confusing.
Rak was getting shots off at will against Duke - he was just a couple feet outside his norm, and missing btw. And, if that's happening even with TC on the court for 40 minutes, then I guess we have NOTHING to lose, eh?