Are they really proposing to remove 3 walls? Or integrating other buildings via openings, walkways, doors? Anything on the exterior, does it really impact seating sight lines? I didn't take that article at all as tearing out the internal seating structure. Adding some boxes sure or maybe renovating some bleachers to seating but not a total redo to the basic inside structure.
That for $400M dollars?
Yeesh.
I think this (multi-use) is the only way significant public money will be contributed towards renovation of a private on-campus facility.You invest that kind of money that facility is going to be booked as close to 365 as possible, that's why you have a roof. Not six/seven football games, but six/seven football games, soccer, lax, summer tourneys, pro soccer/lax, spring, summer, fall concerts.
I agree ... with all that is included in the Brown plan, there are some very big-ticket items:We're seeing $400-500m and the word Dome and thinking it's the cost for the Dome reno. I think those kind of numbers are much more than a Dome reno. Dome reno minimizes what it really is as a project.
If we're integrating archbold and the Falk school into the facility, there will no doubt be renos to those building besides connecting them. There appears per the article this proposal includes a new building on the Irving side. As a ripple effect there would be impacts to current roads, parking lots and walkways. Even landscaping would need to be completely redone. It's much more than just renovating the Dome. It's not a facelift. It almost becomes a new complex for that whole part of campus.
Certainly a way to get fans from downtown to the Dome .. or South Campus to the Dome if West stadium parking disappears with all this building.That would be sweet. Seriously.
this has been the main issue all along. yeah we can seat 35K for bball but 10K are bad seats. this was because no one dreamed they would need more than 10-15K of decent seats for bball. had they, we would have run the court the other direction and built both ends to roll out from day 1. you could easily add 5K of seats behind the current roll out without changing anythingfrom what I heard this isn't the case. They are building around the current structure and just changing the seating. I'm guessing the added seating will come from a bigger mobile stand for basketball. Historically there has never been a need for as many football seats as we currently have. I'm also guessing that the added boxes will be on the basketball end of the stadium.
Ok so you wish we'd build a new stadium that looks like a soccer stadium over by the mall. And I am super excited by the fact that the chancellor is viewing this in a more nuanced way and understands the true value of athletics to the university and can see that having the dome on campus is a big part of that value. It's difficult to put that concept in to words, but the guy gets it. We will agree to disagree on what constitutes generic.
Yup, exactly - the dome is unique, the success of Syracuse sports given the backdrop is unique. This new facility will be unique and in keeping with those two elements that make the school what it is. This will FEEL like Syracuse, some box by the mall in a partially cleaned up industrial wasteland is not going to feel like anything. Visit Philly's sports complex if you want a taste of that.
Of course we will have to wait and see what the end product looks like - but the actions of this chancellor to date tell me we should not be worried.
Lets just hope the Faegan's redux will be nearly as good! I'm afraid they will turn that into a generic irish pub like you'd find in an outlet shopping mall but we will see.
I agree ... with all that is included in the Brown plan, there are some very big-ticket items:
- installing an "automatically-retractable" BB court (that sounds expensive).
This is not just a face-lift .. it's a campus renewal project.
At which point the people mover will take me directly to my cushioned seat.So which gate does the monorail stop at?
So which gate does the monorail stop at?
They are going to have to figure something out because if you are going to build up the density already in the area you are going to add to the barriers that are keeping some of the crowd away.
There is a cost benefit analysis that marginally interested people perform on would they rather watch the game on TV, or do something else, instead of making the investment in time and energy getting to and into the stadium.
If they school wants to privately fund that, good for them.
How would you know ?Original cost was $26 million with $16 million coming from the state.
Just busting Rogers chops. He actually had some behind the scenes stuff going in with the Dome.It was in the paper at the time. I thought it was 24 but I could be wrong.
And you think it'll be easier getting to campus when the viaduct is roped off for 3 years?Regardless, when they rebuild 81, it would not be easy getting to a stadium at the inner harbor,.
Get off of my cloud.If we can get this drone research hub to take off, maybe that'll solve the parking dilemma. Everyone will someday have drone transportation and cars will be a thing of the past when the FDA figures out how to regulate that airspace in the lowest 1000 feet.
Bring back the Train!!!And you think it'll be easier getting to campus when the viaduct is roped off for 3 years?
Don't know why it's not at least a consideration during the SU games. I'm sure it would need to be upgraded but someone more knowledgeable than me would have to explain why it's gathering dust.Bring back the Train!!!
Need to build a platform downtown...not sure if it is feasible if the intermodal thingie is build near Jamesville.