here's a class breakdown of usc's starters | Syracusefan.com

here's a class breakdown of usc's starters

OrangeMojo

All Conference
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,356
Like
2,720
wait, is that their class by academic designation, or athletic/eligibility? How do we know if the kids who sat out a year will be allowed to return for a fifth season? Maybe they're not redshirt juniors - maybe they're really seniors and just don't realize it yet :bat:
 

SoBristol

All Conference
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,078
Like
2,817
Using this data, can we at last drop the mantra that "we are really young"?
 

OrangeMojo

All Conference
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,356
Like
2,720
the star* indicates they used the redshirt year
I realized that - just being a wiseguy and showing my annoyance at the current system being used by SU regarding a player's class/eligibility.
 

cuseincincy

All Conference
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,249
Like
5,027
there is 4-5 star young and 2 star young
Yep. Kind of a validation game for the star rating system. Most here want to and do believe that SU will have the better coach this week. If so, and the star system is irrelavant than SU should be able to compete quite well. This SU team reminds me a little of the late 70 early 80's teams with Hurley, Monk, Morris etc. Some exciting playmakers on both sides of the ball. But do they have enough?
 

wfschrec

Minister Of Defense
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,622
Like
2,992
Yep. Kind of a validation game for the star rating system. Most here want to and do believe that SU will have the better coach this week. If so, and the star system is irrelavant than SU should be able to compete quite well. This SU team reminds me a little of the late 70 early 80's teams with Hurley, Monk, Morris etc. Some exciting playmakers on both sides of the ball. But do they have enough?

This is by no means a clear validation of the star system ... you have 2-3 stars players that blow up and 4-5 star players that blow up ... using this argument wouldn't Boise vs OU already have decided this whole thing ... I understand this is meant to be rhetorical but its over the top ... the only thing it could do is give fuel for one side of the argument to hold over the other ...
 

chakka3421

All Conference
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
2,080
Like
3,674
My view on coaching is that great coaches can coach up the talent level 1 step higher - meaning making an average team good, a good team great and a great team a championship team contender. But no coach can take an average talented team and make them play on a championship level on a consistent basis. Talent wins out in the end over a season. The theory also works in reverse, a poor coach can take the talent level and have them perform 1 step lower. Most coaches are average coaches in that they dont coach either up or down the talent level on the team.

GRob was an example in my view of a poor coach that took an average talented team that for most games performed on a poor level. DMarrone is currently a good to great coach - if you look at last year alone. He took the same talent that GRob and coach them up to an 8-5 season. GRob had similar talent levels and I believe his best season was 4-8.

What bothers me is this year...our talent level is as good if not better but the performance of the team so far doesnt match the team's talent level - very frustrating to me. Maybe we need USC in more ways - win or lose - to pull them team out of its funk to finally perform at their current talent level or higher.

The only thing I can grant the coaches (and team) so far is game planning issues as they said they had no film to study on either team and both came out with different defenses than last year.
 

bevosu

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
8,279
Like
16,146
GRob was an example in my view of a poor coach that took an average talented team that for most games performed on a poor level.

You make some interesting points. I'd modify the above quote by adding 'very, very' between the a and the poor.
 

SoBristol

All Conference
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,078
Like
2,817
The only positive note about GROB (other than being a nice enough guy) is that he recruited some interesting talent: Hogue, Carter, Bailey, Chew, Chandler Jones, Taj Smith, Derrell Smith, Nassib, Sales, Pugh, Lemon. He wiffed on a lot of bigs, did not use JUCO recruiting (with Taj the exception), and apart from beating Louisville and ND couldn't coach.

Marrone has hit some early gold on the defensive side (the Thomas kids, Spruill and EJ Carter), but so far, hasn't landed playmakers with early impact. I know this is a matter of time and development. Guys like Moore, Broyld or one of the 2012 commits may be Marrone's Carter.
 

CaliCuse

All American
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,208
Like
2,180
wait, is that their class by academic designation, or athletic/eligibility? How do we know if the kids who sat out a year will be allowed to return for a fifth season? Maybe they're not redshirt juniors - maybe they're really seniors and just don't realize it yet :bat:
Or in our case prison time credited. or perhaps owed. I'd like to know what their tax bracket is.:noidea: Presuming they declare all income. We might be able to beat them in a Ricco case.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
157,217
Messages
4,162,531
Members
5,503
Latest member
boilerD

Online statistics

Members online
209
Guests online
669
Total visitors
878




Top Bottom