I honestly have no idea where you got that's crazy story from. I'm I'm? .I mean haven't you been listening to any of the stories out there? I mean when they keep naming the same teams. There's gotta be some truth there you know I've ever heard where there's smoke There's fire. Same applies..
You're trying to tell me that yes you SEC or the big 10 would not take Florida state with the amount. Don't you know the criteria that these conferences go by to get these schools? Invited money for Florida state doesn't bring in money now. I mean I know what you're gonna say Florida won't allow it yeah? Guess what Texas A&M all Those schools have the same d*** thing and look what happened.
Plus another thing we've all kept on hearing is that UNC or I'll put it like this. The big 10 definitely wants North Carolina and virginia and I'm sure the SEC would take Virginia Tech. The ACC has been down for so long besides Clemson and a few years Florida state but they gotta get some collective teams going that is the. Difference between the big 10 and the ACC to she besides the big time probably most likely be. More consistently better consistently better top the bottom but Historically storically when you look at the ACC it should be pretty. Good Virginia Tech was good for so many years. I can name a few more but I mean I think that I think the ACC just thought that they would always be right there or not get picked. Apart who the h*** knows arrogance I? Don't know. I'm not there's no reason why virginia or Virginia Tech cannot be top programs. Why the h*** do you think the big 10 was I'm so bad? North Carolina I mean that's a lot of talent in the state beautiful school one of the most thriving States in the country.
That was pretty incoherent but I think I was able to decipher a few things in that long, un-proofread post.
Name me one expansion move that had smoke before being executed? The internet theories haven't come to fruition. Just because you read it doesn't make it true.
Do you know the criteria, because it doesn't seem so. FSU to the B16 is an extreme long shot because they don't fit the criteria and Miami is the better choice if they really want into Florida.
The SEC doesn't need any more brands. They don't need to expand. Sure FSU is the best brand left, but there isn't a need to grab them. What does FSU bring to the table vs all their warts? Are they really worth it? Do they make the SEC schools more money? Do they take away from LSU, Bama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia? Why offer FSU over Miami?
What was BBall first about adding Miami, VA Tech, BC? Or SU, Pitt, Louisville?
UNC hired name HCs. Just because it didn't turn out doesn't mean they weren't trying.
The B12 does nothing for SU. We have an outside shot at the B16. We have an extreme outside shot at the SEC. Most likely we will (and should) end up in some different makeup of an ACC. That actually gives us a BETTER chance at making the playoffs. We would have zero shot in any other conference. Why would anyone pick $25M more per year to only see 5 W seasons be considered pretty good?
UConn to the B12 likely is not happening. Supposedly the B12 has a pro rata clause for only P5 teams. If UConn isn't also included in that clause, they will not likely be taken. The B12 schools will not vote to lose money. I suppose that UConn can go there and get less money than everyone else. Is that worth it to them to get $15M a year for the next 5-6 years just to be in the B12? I would think not.
As to recruiting winning will do more than money. At best we will be middle of the pack in money. That isn't going to move the needle. So being in a Northeast conference where we can win, would be better for our program.
We have a small football fanbase. That isn't a positive for SU.
The ACC GOR has been a net positive for SU. Saying otherwise is silly.
A Cali post is like a badge of honor. Wear it with pride but don't try and make it a habit!
