SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,621
- Like
- 62,897
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
Notre Dame 16 vs. 14 +2
Clemson 18 vs. 22 -4
Georgia Tech 16 vs. 36 -20
Duke 28 vs. 44 -16
Pittsburgh 20 vs. 20 0
Miami 18 vs. 14 +4
Virginia Tech 22 vs. 22 0
Boston College 24 vs. 18 +6
Pittsburgh 26 vs. 22 +4
Florida State 18 vs. 38 -20
Boston College II 30 vs. 16 +14
North Carolina State 16 vs. 28 -12
Louisville 18 vs. 16 +2
Duke 30 vs. 32 -2
North Carolina 22 vs. 26 -4
Wake Forest 44 vs. 10 +34
Virginia 20 vs. 18 +2
Clemson 18 vs. 20 -2
Comments: We had 404 PIP to 416. We’ve won this stat 8 times and are 7-1 when we did and 3-7 when we don’t.
Last year we were 420-432. We won this stat 7 times. We were 6-1 when we won it, 2-7 when we lost it and 0-2 when we tied.
We aren’t a powerhouse in the Inner Sanctum but we win when we win there.
POP
Notre Dame 52 vs. 37 +15
Clemson 28 vs. 21 +7
Georgia Tech 27 vs. 20 +7
Duke 53 vs. 27 +26
Pittsburgh 42 vs. 35 +7
Miami 48 vs. 34 +14
Virginia Tech 27 vs. 42 -15
Boston College 45 vs. 33 +12
Pittsburgh 25 vs. 19 +6
Florida State 29 vs. 33 -4
Boston College II 21 vs. 27 -6
North Carolina State 31 vs. 25 +6
Louisville 37 vs. 18 +19
Duke 23 vs. 29 -6
North Carolina 50 vs. 33 +17
Wake Forest 22 vs. 32 -10
Virginia 26 vs. 56 -30
Clemson 24 vs. 23 +1
Comments: We had 610 POP to 544. We won this stat 12 times and were 8-4 when we won it and 2-4 when we lost it.
Last year we had 462 POP to 518. We won this stat 6 times. We were 2-4 when we won it and 6-6 when we lose it.
We’ve hit jump shots better this year and it’s mattered a lot more than it did last year.
Trey “The Outer Limits”
Notre Dame 36 vs. 33 +3
Clemson 18 vs. 15 +3
Georgia Tech 21 vs. 18 +3
Duke 33 vs. 27 +6
Pittsburgh 36 vs. 33 +3
Miami 42 vs. 24 +18
Virginia Tech 27 vs. 42 -15
Boston College 33 vs. 27 +6
Pittsburgh 21 vs. 15 +6
Florida State 15 vs. 33 -18
Boston College II 21 vs. 21 0
North Carolina State 15 vs. 15 0
Louisville 33 vs. 15 +18
Duke 15 vs. 27 -12
North Carolina 42 vs. 27 +15
Wake Forest 12 vs. 24 -12
Virginia 24 vs. 54 -30
Clemson 18 vs. 15 +3
Comments: We scored 462 points from the Outer Limits to 465. We’ve won this stat 11 times and tied it twice. We are 8-3 when we won it and 2-5 when we lost it.
Last year we were 330-435. We won this stat 4 times. We were 2-2 when we won it and 6-6 when we lost it. We were 0-2 in two ties.
We’ve had more success beyond the arc and it’s mattered more than it did last year.
The Twilight Zone – between the paint and the three point line
Notre Dame 16 vs. 4 +12
Clemson 10 vs. 6 +4
Georgia Tech 6 vs. 2 +4
Duke 20 vs. 0 +20
Pittsburgh 6 vs. 2 +4
Miami 6 vs. 10 -4
Virginia Tech 0 vs. 0 0
Boston College 12 vs. 6 +6
Pittsburgh 4 vs. 4 0
Florida State 14 vs. 0 +14
Boston College 0 vs. 6 -6
North Carolina State 16 vs. 10 +8
Louisville 4 vs. 0 +4
Duke 8 vs. 2 +6
North Carolina 8 vs. 6 +2
Wake Forest 10 vs 8 +2
Virginia 2 vs. 2 0
Clemson 6 vs. 2 +4
Comments: We scored 148 points from the Twilight Zone to 70. We’ve won this stat 13 times with 3 ties and are 8-5 when we win it, 1-2 when we lose it and 1-1 when we tie it.
Last year, we were 132-78. We won this stat 13 times. We were 5-8 when we won it, 3-1 when we lost it and 0-1 in the one tie.
We are a Twilight Zone team, although there isn’t a strong relationship between wins and losses when we dominate there.
POTO
Notre Dame 11 vs. 10 +1
Clemson 20 vs. 12 +8
Georgia Tech 28 vs. 17 +11
Duke 12 vs. 22 -10
Pittsburgh 26 vs. 19 +7
Miami 9 vs. 3 +6
Virginia Tech 8 vs. 19 -11
Boston College 21 vs. 11 +10
Pittsburgh 16 vs. 14 +2
Florida State 18 vs. 16 +2
Boston College 25 vs. 5 +20
North Carolina State 24 vs. 11 +13
Louisville 16 vs. 5 +13
Duke 9 vs. 9 0
North Carolina 7 vs. 15 -8
Wake Forest 27 vs. 15 +12
Virginia 16 vs. 18 -2
Clemson 11 vs. 16 -5
Comments: We’ve scored 304 points off turnovers to 237. We’ve won this stat 12 times with 1 tie and are 9-3 when we won, 1-4 when we lost and 0-1 when we tied.
Last year we were 218-210). We won this stat 7 times. We were 5-2 when we won it and 2-8 when we lost it. We won the one tie.
We had more turnovers to score off of this year and did a better job of it.
FBP
Notre Dame 2 vs. 2 0
Clemson 9 vs. 4 +5
Georgia Tech 9 vs. 11 -2
Duke 10 vs. 11 -1
Pittsburgh 13 vs. 16 -3
Miami 12 vs. 2 +10
Virginia Tech 1 vs. 12 -11
Boston College 4 vs. 11 -7
Pittsburgh 3 vs. 4 -1
Florida State 4 vs. 29 -24
Boston College II 12 vs. 3 +9
North Carolina State 7 vs. 15 -8
Louisville 11 vs. 7 +4
Duke 6 vs. 6 0
North Carolina 4 vs. 15 -11
Wake Forest 20 vs. 11 +9
Virginia 5 vs. 0 +5
Clemson 0 vs. 0 0
Comments: We scored 132 fast break points to 159. We won this stat 6 times with 3 ties and were 5-1 when we won it, 4-5 when we lost it and 1-2 when we tied.
Last year we were 78-120. We won this stat just 3 times. We were 2-1 when we win it and 5-9 when we lose it. We won the one tie.
Shed a tear for the old days when we used to run teams off the court.
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
Notre Dame 2/38 = 5.3% vs. 2/36 = 5.6% -3
Clemson 9/40 = 22.5% vs. 4/34 = 11.8% +107
Georgia Tech 9/30 = 30.0% vs. 11/44 = 25.0% +50
Duke 10/46 = 21.7% vs. 11/54 = 20.4% +13
Pittsburgh 13/46 = 28.3% vs. 16/32 = 50.0% -217
Miami 12/42 = 28.6% vs. 2/29 = 6.9% +217
Virginia Tech 1/27 = 3.7% vs. 12/29 = 41.4% -377
Boston College 4/24 = 16.7% vs. 11/22 = 50.0% -333
Pittsburgh 3/37 = 8.1% vs. 4/28 = 14.3% -62
Florida State 4/34 = 11.8% vs. 29/38 = 76.3% -645
Boston College 12/43 = 27.9% vs. 3/28 = 10.7% +172
North Carolina State 7/33 = 21.2% vs. 15/49 = 30.6% -94
Louisville 11/40 = 27.5% vs. 7/35 = 20.0% +72
Duke 6/33 = 18.2% vs. 6/38 = 15.8% +24
North Carolina 4/25 = 16.0% vs. 15/35 = 42.9% -269
Wake Forest 20/41 = 48.8% vs. 11/30 = 36.7% +121
Virginia 5/32 = 15.6% vs. 0/43 = 00.0% +156
Clemson 0/36 = 00.0% vs. 0/43 = 00.0% 0
Comments: We scored 132 fast break points in 647 opportunities = 20.4%. They were 159/647 = 24.6%. We won this stat 9 times and are 6-3 when we do and 4-5 when we don’t.
Last year it was 12.1%-19.9%. We won this stat 3 times. We were 2-1 when we won it and 6-9 when we lost it.
We ran more this year but so did our opposition. We are better off when we do it.
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
Notre Dame 55 vs. 42 +13
Clemson 31 vs. 29 +2
Georgia Tech 23 vs. 37 -14
Duke 66 vs. 41 +25
Pittsburgh 47 vs. 22 +25
Miami 48 vs. 27 +21
Virginia Tech 38 vs. 47 -9
Boston College 58 vs. 40 +18
Pittsburgh 39 vs. 24 +15
Florida State 35 vs. 36 -1
Boston College 32 vs. 29 +3
North Carolina State 33 vs. 28 +5
Louisville 32 vs. 12 +20
Duke 29 vs. 42 -13
North Carolina 55 vs. 28 +27
Wake Forest 35 vs. 20 +15
Virginia 25 vs. 61 -36
Clemson 34 vs. 32 +2
Comments: We scored 715 points on our initial sets to 597. We won this stat 13 times and were 10-3 when we won it and 0-5 when we didn’t
Last year: We were 623-641. We won this stat 10 times. We were 4-6 when we won it and 3-4 when we lost it. We won the one tied game.
This is a better offensive team than last years- and a better defensive team. It’s what happened after a miss that pulls this year’ team down.
SCP
Notre Dame 11 vs. 7 +4
Clemson 6 vs. 10 -4
Georgia Tech 11 vs. 8 +3
Duke 5 vs. 19 -14
Pittsburgh 2 vs. 22 -20
Miami 6 vs. 19 -13
Virginia Tech 10 vs. 5 +5
Boston College 7 vs. 7 0
Pittsburgh 9 vs. 13 -4
Florida State 8 vs. 6 +2
Boston College II 7 vs. 11 -4
North Carolina State 7 vs. 10 -3
Louisville 12 vs. 10 +2
Duke 19 vs. 13 +6
North Carolina 13 vs. 16 -3
Wake Forest 11 vs. 11 0
Virginia 16 vs. 13 +3
Clemson 8 vs. 11 -3
Comments: We scored 168 second chance points to 211. We won this stat 7 times with two ties and were 2-5 when we won it, 6-3 when we lost it and 2-0 when we tied it.
Last year we were 182-191. We won this stat 9 times. We were 6-3 when we won it and 2-7 when we lost it.
Last year made sense. This year did not.
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
Notre Dame 0 vs. 3 -3
Clemson 0 vs. 2 -2
Georgia Tech 3 vs. 2 +1
Duke 3 vs. 1 +2
Pittsburgh 2 vs. 3 -2
Miami 1 vs. 5 -4
Virginia Tech 0 vs. 0 0
Boston College 3 vs. 0 +3
Pittsburgh 3 vs. 0 +3
Florida State 2 vs. 2 0
Boston College II 0 vs. 3 -3
North Carolina State 2 vs. 0 +2
Louisville 4 vs. 5 -1
Duke 2 vs. 2 0
North Carolina 3 vs. 2 +1
Wake Forest 0 vs. 0 0
Virginia 3 vs. 0 +3
Clemson 2 vs. 0 +2
Comments: We scored 33 points on our last possessions of a half to 30. We’ve won this stat 8 times and tied it 4 times. We are 3-5 when we win it, 6-0 when we lose it and 1-3 when we tie it.
Last year we were out-scored 35-53. We won this stat 3 times. We were 2-1 in the wins, 5-8 in the losses and 1-1 in two ties.
We did better in last possession this but it didn’t seem to matter. We didn’t have very many games that were decided in final possessions.
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Starter Scoring
Notre Dame 66 vs. 49 +17
Clemson 54 vs. 49 +5
Georgia Tech 50 vs. 65 -15
Duke 82 vs. 63 +19
Pittsburgh 57 vs. 37 +20
Miami 54 vs. 35 +19
Virginia Tech 47 vs. 51 -4
Boston College 61 vs. 54 +7
Pittsburgh 54 vs. 54 0
Florida State 56 vs. 48 +8
Boston College I 44 vs. 27 +17
North Carolina State 38 vs. 52 -14
Louisville 47 vs. 35 +12
Duke 53 vs. 71 -18
North Carolina 69 vs. 75 -7
Wake Forest 63 vs. 31 +32
Virginia 42 vs. 62 -20
Clemson 30 vs. 60 -30
Comments: Our starters scored 967 to 918. We won this stat 9 times and were even once. We are 8-1 when we win it, 1-7 when we lose it and won the tied game.
Last year is was 1078-810. We won this stat 16 times. We were 7-9 when we won it and 1-1 when we lost it.
When you have a short bench, your starters need to win the battle vs. their starters. We had a better bench this year so they won it lest often and by smaller margins. But it actually seemed to make more of a difference as we didn’t have the deficit from the bench we normally have. Our starters have been out-scored 6 times in 7 games, a disturbing trend.
Bench Scoring
Notre Dame 6 vs. 13 -7
Clemson 7 vs. 4 +3
Georgia Tech 9 vs. 8 +1
Duke 13 vs. 28 -15
Pittsburgh 17 vs. 26 -9
Miami 19 vs. 18 +1
Virginia Tech 9 vs. 17 -8
Boston College 16 vs. 17 -1
Pittsburgh 11 vs. 2 +9
Florida State 6 vs. 32 -26
Boston College II 23 vs. 29 -6
North Carolina State 20 vs. 21 -1
Louisville 22 vs. 14 +8
Duke 12 vs. 4 +8
North Carolina 16 vs. 18 -2
Wake Forest 16 vs. 23 -7
Virginia 11 vs. 17 -6
Clemson 25 vs. 7 +18
Comments: Our bench has scored 258 points to 298. We have won this stat 7 times and are 4-3 when we do. We are 6-5 when we lost it.
Last year our bench was outscored 83-317. We won this stat 2 times. We were 2-0 when we won it and 6-10 when we lost it.
Thank you Marek and Buddy.
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
Notre Dame 11/28 = 39.3% vs. 16/20 = 80.0% -407
Clemson 12/20 = 60.0% vs. 14/19 = 73.7% -137
Georgia Tech 13/18 = 72.2% vs. 16/25 = 64.0% +82
Duke 13/35 = 37.1% vs. 21/31 = 67.7% - 306
Pittsburgh 17/25 = 68.0% vs. 8/22 = 36.4% +316
Miami 22/26 = 84.6% vs. 11/20 = 55.0% +296
Virginia Tech 7/20 = 35.0% vs. 23/25 = 92.0% -570
Boston College 11/29 = 37.9% vs. 13/21 = 61.9% -240
Pittsburgh 11/22 = 50.0% vs. 18/18 = 77.8% -278
Florida State 7/21 = 33.3% vs. 25/30 = 83.3% -500
Boston College 10/22 = 45.5% vs. 12/18 = 67.7% -222
North Carolina State 8/21 = 38.1% vs. 19/24 = 79.2% -411
Louisville 12/22 = 54.5% vs. 9/14 = 64.3% -98
Duke 12/24 = 50.0% vs. 16/26 = 61.5% -115
North Carolina 17/29 = 58.6% vs. 19/25 = 76.0% -174
Wake Forest 13/31 = 41.9% vs. 10/17 = 58.8% -169
Virginia 8/19 = 42.1% vs. 21/28 = 75.0% -329
Clemson 8/18 = 44.4% vs. 13/19 = 68.4% -240
Comments: We are 212 /430 = 49.3% vs. 284/402 = 70.6%. We won this stat 3 times and were 2-1 in those games. We lost the stat 15 times, including the last 12 times in a row and were 8-7 in those games.
Last year it was 50.9%-75.5%. We won this stat 1 time. We were 0-1 when we won it and 8-9 when we lost it.
Our offense just doesn’t produce assists: we shoot it form outside or try to drive all the way to the basket. We can’t get pick and rolls because our big men can’t catch or shoot. Still it functions better when we penetrate and pass the ball and our stats here would improve if we did more of that. Fortunately, it’s an over-rated stat when you look at the won-lost record.
Notre Dame 16 vs. 14 +2
Clemson 18 vs. 22 -4
Georgia Tech 16 vs. 36 -20
Duke 28 vs. 44 -16
Pittsburgh 20 vs. 20 0
Miami 18 vs. 14 +4
Virginia Tech 22 vs. 22 0
Boston College 24 vs. 18 +6
Pittsburgh 26 vs. 22 +4
Florida State 18 vs. 38 -20
Boston College II 30 vs. 16 +14
North Carolina State 16 vs. 28 -12
Louisville 18 vs. 16 +2
Duke 30 vs. 32 -2
North Carolina 22 vs. 26 -4
Wake Forest 44 vs. 10 +34
Virginia 20 vs. 18 +2
Clemson 18 vs. 20 -2
Comments: We had 404 PIP to 416. We’ve won this stat 8 times and are 7-1 when we did and 3-7 when we don’t.
Last year we were 420-432. We won this stat 7 times. We were 6-1 when we won it, 2-7 when we lost it and 0-2 when we tied.
We aren’t a powerhouse in the Inner Sanctum but we win when we win there.
POP
Notre Dame 52 vs. 37 +15
Clemson 28 vs. 21 +7
Georgia Tech 27 vs. 20 +7
Duke 53 vs. 27 +26
Pittsburgh 42 vs. 35 +7
Miami 48 vs. 34 +14
Virginia Tech 27 vs. 42 -15
Boston College 45 vs. 33 +12
Pittsburgh 25 vs. 19 +6
Florida State 29 vs. 33 -4
Boston College II 21 vs. 27 -6
North Carolina State 31 vs. 25 +6
Louisville 37 vs. 18 +19
Duke 23 vs. 29 -6
North Carolina 50 vs. 33 +17
Wake Forest 22 vs. 32 -10
Virginia 26 vs. 56 -30
Clemson 24 vs. 23 +1
Comments: We had 610 POP to 544. We won this stat 12 times and were 8-4 when we won it and 2-4 when we lost it.
Last year we had 462 POP to 518. We won this stat 6 times. We were 2-4 when we won it and 6-6 when we lose it.
We’ve hit jump shots better this year and it’s mattered a lot more than it did last year.
Trey “The Outer Limits”
Notre Dame 36 vs. 33 +3
Clemson 18 vs. 15 +3
Georgia Tech 21 vs. 18 +3
Duke 33 vs. 27 +6
Pittsburgh 36 vs. 33 +3
Miami 42 vs. 24 +18
Virginia Tech 27 vs. 42 -15
Boston College 33 vs. 27 +6
Pittsburgh 21 vs. 15 +6
Florida State 15 vs. 33 -18
Boston College II 21 vs. 21 0
North Carolina State 15 vs. 15 0
Louisville 33 vs. 15 +18
Duke 15 vs. 27 -12
North Carolina 42 vs. 27 +15
Wake Forest 12 vs. 24 -12
Virginia 24 vs. 54 -30
Clemson 18 vs. 15 +3
Comments: We scored 462 points from the Outer Limits to 465. We’ve won this stat 11 times and tied it twice. We are 8-3 when we won it and 2-5 when we lost it.
Last year we were 330-435. We won this stat 4 times. We were 2-2 when we won it and 6-6 when we lost it. We were 0-2 in two ties.
We’ve had more success beyond the arc and it’s mattered more than it did last year.
The Twilight Zone – between the paint and the three point line
Notre Dame 16 vs. 4 +12
Clemson 10 vs. 6 +4
Georgia Tech 6 vs. 2 +4
Duke 20 vs. 0 +20
Pittsburgh 6 vs. 2 +4
Miami 6 vs. 10 -4
Virginia Tech 0 vs. 0 0
Boston College 12 vs. 6 +6
Pittsburgh 4 vs. 4 0
Florida State 14 vs. 0 +14
Boston College 0 vs. 6 -6
North Carolina State 16 vs. 10 +8
Louisville 4 vs. 0 +4
Duke 8 vs. 2 +6
North Carolina 8 vs. 6 +2
Wake Forest 10 vs 8 +2
Virginia 2 vs. 2 0
Clemson 6 vs. 2 +4
Comments: We scored 148 points from the Twilight Zone to 70. We’ve won this stat 13 times with 3 ties and are 8-5 when we win it, 1-2 when we lose it and 1-1 when we tie it.
Last year, we were 132-78. We won this stat 13 times. We were 5-8 when we won it, 3-1 when we lost it and 0-1 in the one tie.
We are a Twilight Zone team, although there isn’t a strong relationship between wins and losses when we dominate there.
POTO
Notre Dame 11 vs. 10 +1
Clemson 20 vs. 12 +8
Georgia Tech 28 vs. 17 +11
Duke 12 vs. 22 -10
Pittsburgh 26 vs. 19 +7
Miami 9 vs. 3 +6
Virginia Tech 8 vs. 19 -11
Boston College 21 vs. 11 +10
Pittsburgh 16 vs. 14 +2
Florida State 18 vs. 16 +2
Boston College 25 vs. 5 +20
North Carolina State 24 vs. 11 +13
Louisville 16 vs. 5 +13
Duke 9 vs. 9 0
North Carolina 7 vs. 15 -8
Wake Forest 27 vs. 15 +12
Virginia 16 vs. 18 -2
Clemson 11 vs. 16 -5
Comments: We’ve scored 304 points off turnovers to 237. We’ve won this stat 12 times with 1 tie and are 9-3 when we won, 1-4 when we lost and 0-1 when we tied.
Last year we were 218-210). We won this stat 7 times. We were 5-2 when we won it and 2-8 when we lost it. We won the one tie.
We had more turnovers to score off of this year and did a better job of it.
FBP
Notre Dame 2 vs. 2 0
Clemson 9 vs. 4 +5
Georgia Tech 9 vs. 11 -2
Duke 10 vs. 11 -1
Pittsburgh 13 vs. 16 -3
Miami 12 vs. 2 +10
Virginia Tech 1 vs. 12 -11
Boston College 4 vs. 11 -7
Pittsburgh 3 vs. 4 -1
Florida State 4 vs. 29 -24
Boston College II 12 vs. 3 +9
North Carolina State 7 vs. 15 -8
Louisville 11 vs. 7 +4
Duke 6 vs. 6 0
North Carolina 4 vs. 15 -11
Wake Forest 20 vs. 11 +9
Virginia 5 vs. 0 +5
Clemson 0 vs. 0 0
Comments: We scored 132 fast break points to 159. We won this stat 6 times with 3 ties and were 5-1 when we won it, 4-5 when we lost it and 1-2 when we tied.
Last year we were 78-120. We won this stat just 3 times. We were 2-1 when we win it and 5-9 when we lose it. We won the one tie.
Shed a tear for the old days when we used to run teams off the court.
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
Notre Dame 2/38 = 5.3% vs. 2/36 = 5.6% -3
Clemson 9/40 = 22.5% vs. 4/34 = 11.8% +107
Georgia Tech 9/30 = 30.0% vs. 11/44 = 25.0% +50
Duke 10/46 = 21.7% vs. 11/54 = 20.4% +13
Pittsburgh 13/46 = 28.3% vs. 16/32 = 50.0% -217
Miami 12/42 = 28.6% vs. 2/29 = 6.9% +217
Virginia Tech 1/27 = 3.7% vs. 12/29 = 41.4% -377
Boston College 4/24 = 16.7% vs. 11/22 = 50.0% -333
Pittsburgh 3/37 = 8.1% vs. 4/28 = 14.3% -62
Florida State 4/34 = 11.8% vs. 29/38 = 76.3% -645
Boston College 12/43 = 27.9% vs. 3/28 = 10.7% +172
North Carolina State 7/33 = 21.2% vs. 15/49 = 30.6% -94
Louisville 11/40 = 27.5% vs. 7/35 = 20.0% +72
Duke 6/33 = 18.2% vs. 6/38 = 15.8% +24
North Carolina 4/25 = 16.0% vs. 15/35 = 42.9% -269
Wake Forest 20/41 = 48.8% vs. 11/30 = 36.7% +121
Virginia 5/32 = 15.6% vs. 0/43 = 00.0% +156
Clemson 0/36 = 00.0% vs. 0/43 = 00.0% 0
Comments: We scored 132 fast break points in 647 opportunities = 20.4%. They were 159/647 = 24.6%. We won this stat 9 times and are 6-3 when we do and 4-5 when we don’t.
Last year it was 12.1%-19.9%. We won this stat 3 times. We were 2-1 when we won it and 6-9 when we lost it.
We ran more this year but so did our opposition. We are better off when we do it.
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
Notre Dame 55 vs. 42 +13
Clemson 31 vs. 29 +2
Georgia Tech 23 vs. 37 -14
Duke 66 vs. 41 +25
Pittsburgh 47 vs. 22 +25
Miami 48 vs. 27 +21
Virginia Tech 38 vs. 47 -9
Boston College 58 vs. 40 +18
Pittsburgh 39 vs. 24 +15
Florida State 35 vs. 36 -1
Boston College 32 vs. 29 +3
North Carolina State 33 vs. 28 +5
Louisville 32 vs. 12 +20
Duke 29 vs. 42 -13
North Carolina 55 vs. 28 +27
Wake Forest 35 vs. 20 +15
Virginia 25 vs. 61 -36
Clemson 34 vs. 32 +2
Comments: We scored 715 points on our initial sets to 597. We won this stat 13 times and were 10-3 when we won it and 0-5 when we didn’t
Last year: We were 623-641. We won this stat 10 times. We were 4-6 when we won it and 3-4 when we lost it. We won the one tied game.
This is a better offensive team than last years- and a better defensive team. It’s what happened after a miss that pulls this year’ team down.
SCP
Notre Dame 11 vs. 7 +4
Clemson 6 vs. 10 -4
Georgia Tech 11 vs. 8 +3
Duke 5 vs. 19 -14
Pittsburgh 2 vs. 22 -20
Miami 6 vs. 19 -13
Virginia Tech 10 vs. 5 +5
Boston College 7 vs. 7 0
Pittsburgh 9 vs. 13 -4
Florida State 8 vs. 6 +2
Boston College II 7 vs. 11 -4
North Carolina State 7 vs. 10 -3
Louisville 12 vs. 10 +2
Duke 19 vs. 13 +6
North Carolina 13 vs. 16 -3
Wake Forest 11 vs. 11 0
Virginia 16 vs. 13 +3
Clemson 8 vs. 11 -3
Comments: We scored 168 second chance points to 211. We won this stat 7 times with two ties and were 2-5 when we won it, 6-3 when we lost it and 2-0 when we tied it.
Last year we were 182-191. We won this stat 9 times. We were 6-3 when we won it and 2-7 when we lost it.
Last year made sense. This year did not.
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
Notre Dame 0 vs. 3 -3
Clemson 0 vs. 2 -2
Georgia Tech 3 vs. 2 +1
Duke 3 vs. 1 +2
Pittsburgh 2 vs. 3 -2
Miami 1 vs. 5 -4
Virginia Tech 0 vs. 0 0
Boston College 3 vs. 0 +3
Pittsburgh 3 vs. 0 +3
Florida State 2 vs. 2 0
Boston College II 0 vs. 3 -3
North Carolina State 2 vs. 0 +2
Louisville 4 vs. 5 -1
Duke 2 vs. 2 0
North Carolina 3 vs. 2 +1
Wake Forest 0 vs. 0 0
Virginia 3 vs. 0 +3
Clemson 2 vs. 0 +2
Comments: We scored 33 points on our last possessions of a half to 30. We’ve won this stat 8 times and tied it 4 times. We are 3-5 when we win it, 6-0 when we lose it and 1-3 when we tie it.
Last year we were out-scored 35-53. We won this stat 3 times. We were 2-1 in the wins, 5-8 in the losses and 1-1 in two ties.
We did better in last possession this but it didn’t seem to matter. We didn’t have very many games that were decided in final possessions.
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Starter Scoring
Notre Dame 66 vs. 49 +17
Clemson 54 vs. 49 +5
Georgia Tech 50 vs. 65 -15
Duke 82 vs. 63 +19
Pittsburgh 57 vs. 37 +20
Miami 54 vs. 35 +19
Virginia Tech 47 vs. 51 -4
Boston College 61 vs. 54 +7
Pittsburgh 54 vs. 54 0
Florida State 56 vs. 48 +8
Boston College I 44 vs. 27 +17
North Carolina State 38 vs. 52 -14
Louisville 47 vs. 35 +12
Duke 53 vs. 71 -18
North Carolina 69 vs. 75 -7
Wake Forest 63 vs. 31 +32
Virginia 42 vs. 62 -20
Clemson 30 vs. 60 -30
Comments: Our starters scored 967 to 918. We won this stat 9 times and were even once. We are 8-1 when we win it, 1-7 when we lose it and won the tied game.
Last year is was 1078-810. We won this stat 16 times. We were 7-9 when we won it and 1-1 when we lost it.
When you have a short bench, your starters need to win the battle vs. their starters. We had a better bench this year so they won it lest often and by smaller margins. But it actually seemed to make more of a difference as we didn’t have the deficit from the bench we normally have. Our starters have been out-scored 6 times in 7 games, a disturbing trend.
Bench Scoring
Notre Dame 6 vs. 13 -7
Clemson 7 vs. 4 +3
Georgia Tech 9 vs. 8 +1
Duke 13 vs. 28 -15
Pittsburgh 17 vs. 26 -9
Miami 19 vs. 18 +1
Virginia Tech 9 vs. 17 -8
Boston College 16 vs. 17 -1
Pittsburgh 11 vs. 2 +9
Florida State 6 vs. 32 -26
Boston College II 23 vs. 29 -6
North Carolina State 20 vs. 21 -1
Louisville 22 vs. 14 +8
Duke 12 vs. 4 +8
North Carolina 16 vs. 18 -2
Wake Forest 16 vs. 23 -7
Virginia 11 vs. 17 -6
Clemson 25 vs. 7 +18
Comments: Our bench has scored 258 points to 298. We have won this stat 7 times and are 4-3 when we do. We are 6-5 when we lost it.
Last year our bench was outscored 83-317. We won this stat 2 times. We were 2-0 when we won it and 6-10 when we lost it.
Thank you Marek and Buddy.
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
Notre Dame 11/28 = 39.3% vs. 16/20 = 80.0% -407
Clemson 12/20 = 60.0% vs. 14/19 = 73.7% -137
Georgia Tech 13/18 = 72.2% vs. 16/25 = 64.0% +82
Duke 13/35 = 37.1% vs. 21/31 = 67.7% - 306
Pittsburgh 17/25 = 68.0% vs. 8/22 = 36.4% +316
Miami 22/26 = 84.6% vs. 11/20 = 55.0% +296
Virginia Tech 7/20 = 35.0% vs. 23/25 = 92.0% -570
Boston College 11/29 = 37.9% vs. 13/21 = 61.9% -240
Pittsburgh 11/22 = 50.0% vs. 18/18 = 77.8% -278
Florida State 7/21 = 33.3% vs. 25/30 = 83.3% -500
Boston College 10/22 = 45.5% vs. 12/18 = 67.7% -222
North Carolina State 8/21 = 38.1% vs. 19/24 = 79.2% -411
Louisville 12/22 = 54.5% vs. 9/14 = 64.3% -98
Duke 12/24 = 50.0% vs. 16/26 = 61.5% -115
North Carolina 17/29 = 58.6% vs. 19/25 = 76.0% -174
Wake Forest 13/31 = 41.9% vs. 10/17 = 58.8% -169
Virginia 8/19 = 42.1% vs. 21/28 = 75.0% -329
Clemson 8/18 = 44.4% vs. 13/19 = 68.4% -240
Comments: We are 212 /430 = 49.3% vs. 284/402 = 70.6%. We won this stat 3 times and were 2-1 in those games. We lost the stat 15 times, including the last 12 times in a row and were 8-7 in those games.
Last year it was 50.9%-75.5%. We won this stat 1 time. We were 0-1 when we won it and 8-9 when we lost it.
Our offense just doesn’t produce assists: we shoot it form outside or try to drive all the way to the basket. We can’t get pick and rolls because our big men can’t catch or shoot. Still it functions better when we penetrate and pass the ball and our stats here would improve if we did more of that. Fortunately, it’s an over-rated stat when you look at the won-lost record.
