all the big 10 reporters and scott grey gets the scoop? Don't think so.
He is an idiot.
all the big 10 reporters and scott grey gets the scoop? Don't think so.
umm...You'd split your money, largely generated by football, with a basketball program just because they've won national titles? There's really no guarantee they'd win another one. Maybe they could get Johns Hopkins in a package deal, grab some lax titles?
sdhusky said:Don't think so. May happen eventually.
However... I will say this - the B1G has done a much better job of keeping things quiet, so anything is possible.
The amount matters of course, but if we are talking about UConn to the B1G then the fact that the B1G/BTN was able to negotiate a deal 4 months before the CFB season shows that UConn being the B1G isn't necessary. UConn doesn't have the FB cache to warrant B1G merit thus unless they were needed for NYC cable boxes they aren't going to be a viable target.Of course the amount is news. It's critically important. If the BTN is getting 15 cents instead of 1 dollar, that's a totally different calculus in determining if their move into NJ was worth it.
Throughout the past 10 years of realignment and media speculation, the figures people throw around online are often utterly ludicrous.
By getting back to what we've done for the past 50+ years beating them. Ben built the program up, and did it, Mac came along , and did the same. The problems started by Jake hiring on the cheap with Paul who was a great position coach, but not the person to be the head coach. Then the fiasco with Grob, but Doug started the road back, and Scott like Ben, and Mac before him, won't be satisfied with anything less then beating them.How do you make the football schools FSU and Clemson say yes to that Mark?
So who's the 16th team joining with UConn? Did the Colombo who cracked this case bother to include that necessary detail?
Yeah, I'm sure they'd love Virginia or UNC, maybe Missouri if they could have a do-over but Oklahoma would be a big win for them. For all the talk of Kansas, their football is awful, low population and falling academics. They have a 93% acceptance rate; kind of shows that AAU status doesn't always equal a top notch undergraduate program.If I was the Big 10, the only other school I'd look at is Oklahoma.
Entirely possible.UConn would just be a shot across the ACC bow. An NC or VA school would be the direct hit.
Part of me thinks this is just a scare technique by the Big 10 to get the ACC to jump and grab UConn thus pissing off the football schools.
I would bet that Texas is well aware that if it were to want a deal like ND's, 5/8ths membership in football, that Swofford would back its desire.I don't see any school going anywhere for the time being.
That being said, if i were Swofford, every morning my first call would be to the AD at Texas. Every evening my last call would be to the President of UT. Texas holds the key to all future expansion. The biggest fish and a viable option for all four power conferences.
Could be formulating a backup plan in case the RU dumpster fire turns into a raging tire fire and becomes too much to take. Or just a not so subtle message to RU to get their "stuff" in order as we still have options.The only way it makes sense is if they were trying to drop Rutgers in favor of UCONN... (Like saying you'd rather have the runs than vomit). And that ship has sailed, I think.
Could be formulating a backup plan in case the RU dumpster fire turns into a raging tire fire and becomes too much to take. Or just a not so subtle message to RU to get their "stuff" in order as we still have options.
I think Delaney is taking the long view with Rutgers.
He thinks that if they pump B1G money into that program and have the likes of Penn St, Ohio St, MI, Nebraska coming to NJ, it will turn things around.
He might be right, but nobody has ever gotten poor by betting against Rutgers.
Well, if true, that didn't take long.
Not surprised, really.
The B1G has been beating the ACC to the punch every chance it gets.
This would lock up the NY market for the B1G.
From an institutional perspective the ACC is a better fit than the BIG for SU. More private and mid sized schools instead of giant State U's. SU can compete on an equal footing in terms of resources and revenue.
I'm also trying to envision a world where:
((Rutgers + Maryland)) / ((Syracuse + Pitt + Notre Dame + Louisvile) * (hoops tourney in DC / hoops tourney in DC and NYC) * (reigning football national champion)) = being beaten to the punch every chance they get.
Rutgers is also getting a much smaller share than their B1g competition. While paying back their debts, they'll fall way back behind their conference competition.I like this to the nth power, because you so inexplicably left exponents out of the formula.
To the post above about the B1G thinking they can make Rutgers better by pumping more money into them and having big schools visit, how exactly is that plan working for, say, Minnesota football, or Illinois football, or Indiana football, or Purdue football, or should I continue?