From the BY:
Yeah, I don't think you have to worry about Syracuse giving Danny Hurley $8M.
I don't think you have to worry about Syracuse giving Danny Hurley $2.
ThIs F0nT i$ Aw5oMe!!!
I had a student years ago who brought in a bunch of magazines so he could cut pictures out for a project. Letters of varying sized had already been cut out, and I asked why.
"I don't know. My mom got the magazines when she was clearing out my uncles house after he died."
From the BY:
Yeah, I don't think you have to worry about Syracuse giving Danny Hurley $8M.
I don't think you have to worry about Syracuse giving Danny Hurley $2.
He wouldn’t pass the drug test.personally, I wouldn't rule him out for a dome usher position, although there is the risk of him roughing up an elderly fan over some trivial issue.
Let's calm down with how 'bad' UConn is. They've beaten SU 2 of the last 3 and 3 of the last 5 they've played against each other. The trash talk rings a bit hollow.
Time to break out this oneLet's calm down with how 'bad' UConn is. They've beaten SU 2 of the last 3 and 3 of the last 5 they've played against each other. The trash talk rings a bit hollow.
If they hadn't beaten us, or even if we hadn't scheduled them... They would have had 0 quality wins last year.Let's calm down with how 'bad' UConn is. They've beaten SU 2 of the last 3 and 3 of the last 5 they've played against each other. The trash talk rings a bit hollow.
This makes no sense. An awful team can win a head to head game. So what. They have had multiple losing seasons while playing in the AAC. They literally could not finish in the top half of that trash heap of a conference. They have not sniffed a post season in years. If that is not awful, not sure what standards you are applying here?
That said do I expect they will get better? Most likely yes. But they have been absolutely horrendous for a while now. That is not a debatable point.
This makes no sense. An awful team can win a head to head game. So what. They have had multiple losing seasons while playing in the AAC. They literally could not finish in the top half of that trash heap of a conference. They have not sniffed a post season in years. If that is not awful, not sure what standards you are applying here?
That said do I expect they will get better? Most likely yes. But they have been absolutely horrendous for a while now. That is not a debatable point.
I’m not saying they are a better program right now or that beating Syracuse means they’ve been successful. All I’m saying is that criticism from fans of a team/program that they’ve been able to best more than not recently, isn’t the best look.
Incorrect. Pet Rocks have a slight return on investment. UConn...He might as well have invested in pet rocks or 8 track tape players
Why? They have to play someone. Why pay a massive exit fee to lose to someone outside the ACC for the sake of joining a worse conference when you can lose to ACC teams, avoid the exit fee, and be in a great conference?Sure but now that conference can claim more recent NCs than before.
Also since Notre Dame has gone B1G for hockey would not be shocked if they join it for hoops once this contract is up. That’s a long way off though. But expect that if they lose too many of the 5 ACC football games they play annually.
To be clear, Rutgers is playing in the B1G because Penn State recruits students, donors, and athletes out of the state, and PSU threatened to walk and join the ACC.MAC already took in Umass football only.
I hate them as much as you but they tick the same boxes Buttgers did to get into the B1G. And are an automatic win. NY/New England market has a lot of people. A lesser conference will take them. Heck they would be smart to push for MWC travel doesn’t matter for football it’s just 4 road games a year they’re not shlepping field hockey to Lubbock like WVU.
Unless they can find another team to invite, the MAC probably won't take UConn for football because right now they have two divisions of 6 teams each.To be clear, Rutgers is playing in the B1G because Penn State recruits students, donors, and athletes out of the state, and PSU threatened to walk and join the ACC.
UConn May end up in the MAC and/or receive an invite. But unless the MAC has a key school that recruits New England heavily that’s threatening to walk without UConn’s inclusion in the conference, then the situations are different.
Why? They have to play someone. Why pay a massive exit fee to lose to someone outside the ACC for the sake of joining a worse conference when you can lose to ACC teams, avoid the exit fee, and be in a great conference?
To be clear, Rutgers is playing in the B1G because Penn State recruits students, donors, and athletes out of the state, and PSU threatened to walk and join the ACC.
UConn May end up in the MAC and/or receive an invite. But unless the MAC has a key school that recruits New England heavily that’s threatening to walk without UConn’s inclusion in the conference, then the situations are different.
I’m not sure how much ND could soften their schedule irrespective of the ACC alliance. Whatever they put together has to pass a laugh test.They are in a perfect spot... unless they lose too many ACC games and want more scheduling control. Just saying there is another option for them.
They might have minimal appeal to a lesser conference for TV purposes. That’s hardly like saying they deserve to be a P5. Umass pulled it off for a short period although they were booted from the MAC for not joining in all sports. But that might not even be in their best interests joining CUSA.
Getting some money from SNY for football along with a few buy games a year getting drilled by the likes of Bama on the road could put them in the black. Umass has a deal with one of those random sports channels I get on fios doubt it pays much but I’m sure they’ll find something like that.