HRE Otto IV
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2016
- Messages
- 8,347
- Like
- 14,004
I agree with the original point about math. However...
It is not set in stone that Brady is the best ever. For some reason Pats fans are more Brady fans than Pats fans. It is a team sport. Belichick and the systems on both sides of the ball have a lot to do with titles as well. It isn't just Brady, who actually had a poor game by his standards last night. Heck Atlanta missed 3 INTs the last two Pats drives.
You cannot just go by titles because then Bradshaw (who IMO isn't even Top 25) is an all time great. Also you would need to put Starr (5-1 in championship games) in the top 2, which no one thinks.
IMO Montana is #1 still and I hate Montana more than any QB who has ever lived. IMO what he did at KC is what sets him apart. He proved it wasn't just SF.
It is not set in stone that Brady is the best ever. For some reason Pats fans are more Brady fans than Pats fans. It is a team sport. Belichick and the systems on both sides of the ball have a lot to do with titles as well. It isn't just Brady, who actually had a poor game by his standards last night. Heck Atlanta missed 3 INTs the last two Pats drives.
You cannot just go by titles because then Bradshaw (who IMO isn't even Top 25) is an all time great. Also you would need to put Starr (5-1 in championship games) in the top 2, which no one thinks.
IMO Montana is #1 still and I hate Montana more than any QB who has ever lived. IMO what he did at KC is what sets him apart. He proved it wasn't just SF.