Future Campus Framework Discussion | Page 200 | Syracusefan.com

Future Campus Framework Discussion

SC population is exploding with what RE agents call “halfbacks”. Retirees who are tired of the heat, humidity, hurricanes and insurance issues in Florida. Jasper county is one of the fastest growing counties in the US
St Johns County Florida (where I live) is experiencing the same. We have quite a few refugees from South Florida. Winter is 10 degrees cooler and brutal summer heat doesn't last as long and just being a few degrees cooler makes a big difference. Hurricanes have happened but not near the frequency or intensity as other parts of FL. Plus the schools are considered the best or close to the best in the state.
 
In theory these people wouid mostly be sports fans who would have easy access to attend SU sports events.

If SU were to lease the land to developers, who would then build the housing, community center, shopping district, etc, SU would get a lot of income with no risk or investment required. And would still own the land later if it was eventually needed for other purposes.
Lease to a developer, and have them do what the County Exec wants built over at the Great Northern, housing, entertainment,, stores. A complete mini citi within the area.
Also medical facility, etc.
The state and County might even kick in money for the project.
 
St Johns County Florida (where I live) is experiencing the same. We have quite a few refugees from South Florida. Winter is 10 degrees cooler and brutal summer heat doesn't last as long and just being a few degrees cooler makes a big difference. Hurricanes have happened but not near the frequency or intensity as other parts of FL. Plus the schools are considered the best or close to the best in the state.
DUUUUUUUVAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
 
Kind of sad to go back to that point of your life. Move on. (Edit: the thought of it reminds me of a HS friend who hired us for his mom and dad’s Medicaid. He always brought up HS. I remembered none of the things he talked about.)
Eh, it depends on the community. College towns are full of life: restaurants and bars, unique shopping, art, theater, music, sports, etc.

My daughter just graduated from UVA and Charlottesville is precisely the kind of community I’d love to retire to.

Of course, 55+ communities in Florida and the like, where you’re surrounded by a homogeneous group of old people constantly complaining about old people stuff is my personal idea of hell. So maybe I’m an outlier.
 
In theory these people wouid mostly be sports fans who would have easy access to attend SU sports events.

If SU were to lease the land to developers, who would then build the housing, community center, shopping district, etc, SU would get a lot of income with no risk or investment required. And would still own the land later if it was eventually needed for other purposes.
I understand that, but with all the capital needed to make such a development (lets face it, it's a "clear it out and start over" scenario) along with the cost of that capital (high risk investment for a venture fund unless the underwriting bottoms out the acquisition and carry cost. Capital is at a higher interest rate than ever in the last 10 years) SU would have to charge almost nothing for the land to get a fish on, and then assume the risk that it all gets handed back to them if the venture fails. What I am seeing in the market right now, I would be surprised if a developer (a GP) can make it work for the money (a LP) to be committed. Given the potential for highway access, I believe private development would look at that property for industrial/warehousing first.
 
Eh, it depends on the community. College towns are full of life: restaurants and bars, unique shopping, art, theater, music, sports, etc.

My daughter just graduated from UVA and Charlottesville is precisely the kind of community I’d love to retire to.

Of course, 55+ communities in Florida and the like, where you’re surrounded by a homogeneous group of old people constantly complaining about old people stuff is my personal idea of hell. So maybe I’m an outlier.
we should create Villages North, Cuse style. Think of the potential...
 
I just retired 2 months ago, and we decided to be snowbirds for 1-2 months a year max.
Family is all in the north (Syracuse included), and friends too. So, we will warm up for a short time and go back to family, friends, and basketball games. Plus we expect our kids to visit us so they can get away, with whatever rental we find in the south.
 
Are taxes cheaper in Vermont?
VT is one of the worst states for retirees. The tax breaks/benefits for retirees matter a lot more than the headline tax rate (having gone through this exercise for my mother recently). NY was a better location for her than VT. NH better than both though have high property taxes because of no state income taxes. Maine also wasn't that bad. Anywhere else in the northeast has drawbacks (besides PA, which is one of the best).
 
Are taxes cheaper in Vermont?
From what I see on the internet, property taxes are almost the same (1.54% vs 1.56%), state sales tax is higher in VT (4% vs 6% - local sales tax in NY can push that to almost 9% where VT caps out at 7%) and income tax is higher in NY (10.9% vs 8.75% at the highest bracket). So from what I see, yes taxes are higher in NY.
 
Lease to a developer, and have them do what the County Exec wants built over at the Great Northern, housing, entertainment,, stores. A complete mini citi within the area.
Also medical facility, etc.
The state and County might even kick in money for the project.
I am seeing these types of projects grounded down-state. They can't justify the expense and the demand gets limited by the necessary cost of entry. The state only promises marginal reimbursement, meaning the investment must be made by the developer and then go through the process of hoping the state approves paying some of that back.
 
I just retired 2 months ago, and we decided to be snowbirds for 1-2 months a year max.
Family is all in the north (Syracuse included), and friends too. So, we will warm up for a short time and go back to family, friends, and basketball games. Plus we expect our kids to visit us so they can get away, with whatever rental we find in the south.
My folks went with the same intent and now stay 6 months and a day to claim the advantageous FL tax rates.
 
Eh, it depends on the community. College towns are full of life: restaurants and bars, unique shopping, art, theater, music, sports, etc.

My daughter just graduated from UVA and Charlottesville is precisely the kind of community I’d love to retire to.

Of course, 55+ communities in Florida and the like, where you’re surrounded by a homogeneous group of old people constantly complaining about old people stuff is my personal idea of hell. So maybe I’m an outlier.
I agree, and this is why I could see it having a better chance in a town like Ithaca. Syracuse can get there, but IMO the community would need to be in the Armory, not South Campus.
 
From what I see on the internet, property taxes are almost the same (1.54% vs 1.56%), state sales tax is higher in VT (4% vs 6% - local sales tax in NY can push that to almost 9% where VT caps out at 7%) and income tax is higher in NY (10.9% vs 8.75% at the highest bracket). So from what I see, yes taxes are higher in NY.
Property taxes are higher in Vermont. They’re higher in NH as well. Not that it would matter for something like this.
 
I understand that, but with all the capital needed to make such a development (lets face it, it's a "clear it out and start over" scenario) along with the cost of that capital (high risk investment for a venture fund unless the underwriting bottoms out the acquisition and carry cost. Capital is at a higher interest rate than ever in the last 10 years) SU would have to charge almost nothing for the land to get a fish on, and then assume the risk that it all gets handed back to them if the venture fails. What I am seeing in the market right now, I would be surprised if a developer (a GP) can make it work for the money (a LP) to be committed. Given the potential for highway access, I believe private development would look at that property for industrial/warehousing first.
Valid points, all. One way around itis to have SU open up ALL events (sports, music, theater, art shows, everything!) to the seniors in an attractive manner (lower prices, better seating, access to facilities, volunteering options, get-togethers, etc.) and have developers build communities advocating, perhaps including these activities as amenities, as enticement to buy. The communities need not be limited to 55+ or may include sections that are 55+. SU also has to be more open to the community; how, I don't know, I no longer live in the area.

My good friends in College Station own a house not on university property, but close enough to actively involved in what they want, having seasons tickets to football, baseball, theater, purchasing packages for hoops, softball, and other things. They are volunteers at the Pres. George H.W. Bush Presidential Library, have access to some university facilities and groups, etc. The whole package. College Station caters a bit to the retirement crowd, which is closely related to/associated with the alumni crowd. The city encourages cross involvement. I know, Syracuse has a bit of a ways to go on that account and SU has a bit of a way to go involving the City of Syracuse with the University.

I get the territorial nature of the self-interest fights, yet working together, they really can build and rebuild a lot in Syracuse. When the City works with education and industry, it is amazing what can be accomplished. They all need each other and should behave more like adults than in pure self interest. It takes work but the benefits are even grater than pure self interest of the City, SU, and industry.
 
Valid points, all. One way around itis to have SU open up ALL events (sports, music, theater, art shows, everything!) to the seniors in an attractive manner (lower prices, better seating, access to facilities, volunteering options, get-togethers, etc.) and have developers build communities advocating, perhaps including these activities as amenities, as enticement to buy. The communities need not be limited to 55+ or may include sections that are 55+. SU also has to be more open to the community; how, I don't know, I no longer live in the area.

My good friends in College Station own a house not on university property, but close enough to actively involved in what they want, having seasons tickets to football, baseball, theater, purchasing packages for hoops, softball, and other things. They are volunteers at the Pres. George H.W. Bush Presidential Library, have access to some university facilities and groups, etc. The whole package. College Station caters a bit to the retirement crowd, which is closely related to/associated with the alumni crowd. The city encourages cross involvement. I know, Syracuse has a bit of a ways to go on that account and SU has a bit of a way to go involving the City of Syracuse with the University.

I get the territorial nature of the self-interest fights, yet working together, they really can build and rebuild a lot in Syracuse. When the City works with education and industry, it is amazing what can be accomplished. They all need each other and should behave more like adults than in pure self interest. It takes work but the benefits are even grater than pure self interest of the City, SU, and industry.
I am with your last paragraph 100%. The warehouse was a great first effort, but the students there (I have architecture colleagues that spent time there during their studies) felt separated and disassociated from the school they were paying tuition for. The downtown area needs more investment from SU and the city needs to endorse/embrace it. That would create a WHOLE different atmosphere and would even put less pressure on M Street to be the student and non-student entertainment/living zone it is too small to be. South Campus cannot accomplish the same thing.
 
IMO South Campus should either be a large sports complex that can include student-athlete housing if that is needed, (I understand the economics, but this is where the IPF and the Football complex should have gone) or it should be the site of a medical complex/school for the university (highway access and keeping ambulance service out of downtown would be a great benefit for that function here). That med complex can specialize in sports science and medicine and co-locate the two functions. Think HSS in NYC, but integrated into a D1 sports program (Maryland did something like this with Cole Fieldhouse, and Northwestern is looking at something similar I believe in Evanston with their plans for the new stadium and the recent fieldhouse). I know the Cowboys have done something like this too in Dallas.


 
Last edited:
I am with your last paragraph 100%. The warehouse was a great first effort, but the students there (I have architecture colleagues that spent time there during their studies) felt separated and disassociated from the school they were paying tuition for. The downtown area needs more investment from SU and the city needs to endorse/embrace it. That would create a WHOLE different atmosphere and would even put less pressure on M Street to be the student and non-student entertainment/living zone it is too small to be. South Campus cannot accomplish the same thing.
The bolded portion is what TAMU does well. Much more cooperation than territorial dispute between all parties. And as noted above, the developers fit their plans in well with the City and TAMU. BONUS: The City does not lose tax revenue to the University, which is important to Syracuse as a geographically small city. Also, neighboring cities around Syracuse can get in on the act as they are close by.
 
I agree, and this is why I could see it having a better chance in a town like Ithaca. Syracuse can get there, but IMO the community would need to be in the Armory, not South Campus.
I imagine weather would be a huge challenge for a SU-themed retirement community in Syracuse, no matter where they put it.
 
Looks like we are losing the Harrison Street parking lot for football games but a new three story garage with about 100 parking spaces will be attached to the new Graduate by Hilton hotel. This is an affiliate of the large Hilton hotel chain that specializes in locations near colleges and universities.

A new Syracuse University-owned hotel proposed for a location at the corner of Harrison & University would include a 13-story tower with 200 rooms with a rooftop bar, according to documents filed with the city.

IMG_7488.jpeg
 
Looks like we are losing the Harrison Street parking lot for football games but a new three story garage with about 100 parking spaces will be attached to the new Graduate by Hilton hotel. This is an affiliate of the large Hilton hotel chain that specializes in locations near colleges and universities.

A new Syracuse University-owned hotel proposed for a location at the corner of Harrison & University would include a 13-story tower with 200 rooms with a rooftop bar, according to documents filed with the city.

View attachment 252422

When does Harrison go away?
 
My folks went with the same intent and now stay 6 months and a day to claim the advantageous FL tax rates.

FL's 0 state tax rate does make that attractive. My brother in law does the same thing and stays 6 months and a 1 day every year. I'm not ready for that commitment - at least not yet.
 
SC population is exploding with what RE agents call “halfbacks”. Retirees who are tired of the heat, humidity, hurricanes and insurance issues in Florida. Jasper county is one of the fastest growing counties in the US
Beaufort County has exploded in the last 15 years.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,906
Messages
5,120,302
Members
6,074
Latest member
CheerMom12

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
807
Total visitors
886


...
Top Bottom