RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,902
- Like
- 100,177
part of the reason injuries were such a problem were because so many guys were chased off the team
Which was necessary to change the culture of the program.
part of the reason injuries were such a problem were because so many guys were chased off the team
The Cubs just fired their manager after one year and hired Joe Maddon.
What is Maddon thinking?!
Adazzio chased off half the team he inherited too, but it didn't seem to hurt BC.
that's the story but i don't know if i believe itWhich was necessary to change the culture of the program.
that's the story but i don't know if i believe it
Shafer beat Addazzio last year and SU won their bowl game, BC lost. BC plays Lville and Fsu the next 2 games , so we will see where they are at then. One thing to note : Their one year QB will be gone and AJ will just be getting better.It's because Adazzio is a better coach. He's like a great mix of Marrone and Shafer. We need to find that guy and he's out there.
We should have listened to Rob Konrad.
Maryland put up 34 points on what is a good defense, much of it through the air. The only explanation is that they had no idea that Maryland could throw the ball. My point was about being prepared to play a game, not about churning out yards (which is not like churning out points).
Shafer beat Addazzio last year and SU won their bowl game, BC lost. BC plays Lville and Fsu the next 2 games , so we will see where they are at then. One thing to note : Their one year QB will be gone and AJ will just be getting better.
I don't think him posting on a message board is "turning up the heat". He's just stating his opinion.Why can't a genius like you wait until after the last 3 games , which you graciously said that Scott could keep his job if he won. Do you think your making his job easier by turning up the heat on him. Can't you be at least that supportive and patient of a fan.
addazio is a serious meathead spazShafer beat Addazzio last year and SU won their bowl game, BC lost. BC plays Lville and Fsu the next 2 games , so we will see where they are at then. One thing to note : Their one year QB will be gone and AJ will just be getting better.
This is a public place , almost the same as yelling at the dome or his press conference. All kinds of people read this and all forums. He took great time to write his analysis , but wouldn't come right out and say Scott should be fired now , which would have been honest.I don't think him posting on a message board is "turning up the heat". He's just stating his opinion.
No, this is the equivalent of calling into talk radio and stating your opinion.This is a public place , almost the same as yelling at the dome or his press conference. All kinds of people read this and all forums. He took great time to write his analysis , but wouldn't come right out and say Scott should be fired now , which would have been honest.
I would say calling into a radio show and basically saying the coach should be fired is turning up the heat . If you were in his place , you wouldn't feel like that ?No, this is the equivalent of calling into talk radio and stating your opinion.
Millhouse said:that's the story but i don't know if i believe it
RF2044 said:I do. New coach demanding different things from the players, who wants to shake up a losing culture. There were definitely some attrition of players who might have been able to contribute, but if they weren't willing to buy in and do what the new coach was demanding then they would have just been distractions. What's not to believe?
So if someone feels that way, should they not be entitled to state their opinion?I would say calling into a radio show and basically saying the coach should be fired is turning up the heat . If you were in his place , you wouldn't feel like that ?
That is true but with a very few players.
and who were those marginal players he got with those extra scholarships?You are correct. The first group of 9 that got "the call" to meet with Marrone had nothing to do with culture. Nada. After that I guess you can say a few players, such as Williams, were impacted by a "change in culture. But the only 2 I can think of, knowing the story of many of them, were Williams and Speller, and Mayr one other whose name escapes me right now. Other kids left of course because they didn't like their prospects with the team. But the house cleaning of those first 9 were about, what I will call, harvesting scholarships. I'll leave it at that.
You are correct. The first group of 9 that got "the call" to meet with Marrone had nothing to do with culture. Nada. After that I guess you can say a few players, such as Williams, were impacted by a "change in culture. But the only 2 I can think of, knowing the story of many of them, were Williams and Speller, and Mayr one other whose name escapes me right now. Other kids left of course because they didn't like their prospects with the team. But the house cleaning of those first 9 were about, what I will call, harvesting scholarships. I'll leave it at that.
I didn't say Shafer should be fired because I haven't definitively concluded that Shafer should be fired, not because I was being dishonest. I was simply expressing my opinions and asking questions, which by the way, is precisely what message boards are used for.This is a public place , almost the same as yelling at the dome or his press conference. All kinds of people read this and all forums. He took great time to write his analysis , but wouldn't come right out and say Scott should be fired now , which would have been honest.
RF2044 said:What is it that Bill Parcells always talks about with locker room tipping point? All it takes is a few. I don't suggest that all of the attrition departures were trouble makers. Several were people who didn't want to commit to what Marrone required--which is their prerogative, as they didn't sign up for that when they came to SU to play for another coach. And surely some of it had to do with clearing some dead weight to free up scholarships. There were also one or two head scratchers among the departures. But it wasn't all just about harvesting scholarships. It was also about setting a tone and changing the culture so that the team moving forward would be on the same page heading into the offseason.
The term change the culture was minimal. That was my point because people use it so globally. Nice sound bite but not founded in reality.