two3zone
RIP Shark58
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 65,728
- Like
- 62,336
Who cares?
It's a thing called tact. We literally have no benefit of acting like a child and hold him hostage but not giving his release.
Who cares?
I don't think vengeance is the point. If anything, it's a straw man argument. What's at stake is the same principal that applied in the Jason Hart case -- the University's need, indeed its responsibility, to make timely decisions about recruiting and team composition. With classes already started and recruiting decisions completed, this is no longer just about Taurean and his Mom. He could have announced several months ago and no one would be crying foul. Instead, the circumstances couldn't be shadier. That's why there are tampering and transfer rules ... so we can figure out who's playing and recruit accordingly. The U owes that much to its fans and the other players on the team, notwithstanding that it may be temporarily inconvenient for one individual.
This board has lambasted coaches in the past for not granting releases (or not granting them to certain schools), justified or not. Do you really think that recruiters don't mention things like that?Why should SU set a poor precedent and not block it if warranted? What message does that send that it's okay to act in such deceitful fashion and not man up or request a transfer in an honorable, timely and/or reasonable manner? Why would this give opposing coaches 'more' ammunition to negatively recruit against us. This appears far from your garden variety transfer request coming on literally the first day classes begin. Anyone in their right mind should see that from a mile away if a coach attempted to use this outlier type situation to negatively recruit against us. Total garbage!
Yep - 'negative recruiting' is not only stuff like 'that guy is awful' or 'look, they're on probation, or soon will be', etc.I don't disagree in any of your principles. I do think this could get turned around and make us look like the bad guy...very easily. Again, I agree with you and am not saying we shouldn't block it, etc. I could easily see it turned into something like "Syracuse/Boeheim care more about pride and winning games than the happiness/best interest of its student athletes."-I'm not saying this, but could see others turning it into something of sort, even though we know its not the case.
It's a Jersey thingWow the Seton Hall fans are trying to outdo the Rutgers fans for most delusional fan base.
https://setonhall.forums. /threads/todays-question.29900/
It's a Jersey thing
In the space after 'forums.' insert rovals.com, changing the o to an i.I don't think the thread will open, but they have a thread asking whether Seton Hall has closed the gap on us as a program.
This is exactly what will happen.I don't disagree in any of your principles. I do think this could get turned around and make us look like the bad guy...very easily. Again, I agree with you and am not saying we shouldn't block it, etc. I could easily see it turned into something like "Syracuse/Boeheim care more about pride and winning games than the happiness/best interest of its student athletes."-I'm not saying this, but could see others turning it into something of sort, even though we know its not the case.
Pull off the bandage quickly and cleanly w/ minimum damage. Let him go and be done with him, mommy, the whole ball of wax. If we involve ourselves in this soap opera, you can almost guarantee mommy or TT offering a completely different version of events to a muck-racking media. Say goodbye and good riddance.
What's Miami got to do with this?I don't think vengeance is the point. If anything, it's a straw man argument. What's at stake is the same principal that applied in the Jason Hart case -- the University's need, indeed its responsibility, to make timely decisions about recruiting and team composition. With classes already started and recruiting decisions completed, this is no longer just about Taurean and his Mom. He could have announced several months ago and no one would be crying foul. Instead, the circumstances couldn't be shadier. That's why there are tampering and transfer rules ... so we can figure out who's playing and recruit accordingly. The U owes that much to its fans and the other players on the team, notwithstanding that it may be temporarily inconvenient for one individual.
Miami?What's Miami got to do with this?
If the NCAA views this as tampering, they don't need to be prompted by JB or SU, correct? Let them handle it.
And this isn't GOT. JB doesn't need to go all Arya on TT and his mom to please the fan base. I'd rather he put his efforts into making the tournament.
You said "The U".Miami?
they are having a good run; good for them - it doesn't really impact us, even if they take on TT and even if they outrecruit us here & there. the thing that thread points out to me is that Syracuse basketball is the measuring stick for every program in the northeast. they don't aspire to be UConn with their 4 titles, they want to be Cuse. hell, even the boneyard is obsessed with SU despite the fact that Calhoun elevated them well past us for a couple of decadesWow the Seton Hall fans are trying to outdo the Rutgers fans for most delusional fan base.
https://setonhall.forums. /threads/todays-question.29900/
If we are that worried that not blocking it will cause a precedent (i.e. an exodus in the future years) then we have a bigger problem.
The team should not be focused on measures that make players think twice about leaving Syracuse.. it should be to come up with measures that want players to stay.
Conceptually I think all kids should always have one free transfer, so I have a hard time playing hardball here, even thought TT did not act properly in the process.
I'd just block the transfer. There is no reason to allow this kind of behavior, either by the player or SH. Had the decision been more timely, I'd agree that we should just "move on". Unfortunately, the decision appears to have been deliberately delayed to allow the player's mother to shop offers on the AAU circuit. As a result, the timing is very harmful to recruiting and team composition, so (to me) it's more important to discourage the behavior than to let bygones be bygones. I don't remember tampering being involved in Jason Hart's case, but that also involved a very very late change of mind and SU (for good reason) stood its ground.
If SU winds up granting a release (which I don't agree with), I'd suggest 4:30 PM the day after the deadline.
Wow the Seton Hall fans are trying to outdo the Rutgers fans for most delusional fan base.
https://setonhall.forums. /threads/todays-question.29900/
The majority actually came off very reasonable in knowing where they stand as a program. Level headed responses in that thread. Especially when put up against SU.
I was excepting insanity, but have to give them credit for being realistic. They are on the rise, and got screwed in their Tourney game last year. Yes, I had money on them.
Still, they have something going, but don't see many fans with delusions that they have a better program than the Cuse. Nowhere near Rutgers fans. Not even close.
They have had a couple of nice years, both resulting in early tourney exits, they haven't won a tournament game in 13 years, there shouldn't even be a discussion.
I meant Syracuse. U (in some literature) is short for University.You said "The U".
I know what you meant. Just giving you a hard time.I meant Syracuse. U (in some literature) is short for University.