Seeing powel fans comment about no Corsi and birtwistle. I think that is due almost entirely to the zone and them being more dodgers first than feeders/shooters. We got good looks against the zone after some early goofs in the third. Not enough shooting power on this team behind curry and dordevic, and dordevic was looking super worn down. It showed in his shots against the zone.
Was there no post-game presser??Yes, good point re Corsi and Birstwistle. I just get irritated when I see a player do something well (they shot combined 3-5) and then not see them the rest of the game. But you are right their games probably aren't right for attacking a zone. And with a zone you aren't expelling as much energy as you would be against man to man, so you don't have to rotate guys as much. It's too bad Quinn (and of course Hiltz) weren't healthy for this game as I think those two players would have really helped against a zone. I think I saw one skip pass all game, something Hiltz is a wizard at.
At least seeing Corsi and Birtwistle play well made me feel better about next year.
The zone offense did look better against Cornell than they did in previous games - Curry had an excellent pass to Buttermore on the inside of the zone but the Cornell goalie made a nice save. Frustrating to say the least see the offense look near impossible to stop against another top 10 team (Army is the other I am thinking of) but get slowed down by a zone. Given that they were up by a good amount, and the zone is meant to slow the game down, I wish they had done a better job of killing clock. Cornell should have been the one losing their cool, not SU.
So when does Gait start to coach??? Or is Petro the real HC?
Yes, good point re Corsi and Birstwistle. I just get irritated when I see a player do something well (they shot combined 3-5) and then not see them the rest of the game. But you are right their games probably aren't right for attacking a zone. And with a zone you aren't expelling as much energy as you would be against man to man, so you don't have to rotate guys as much. It's too bad Quinn (and of course Hiltz) weren't healthy for this game as I think those two players would have really helped against a zone. I think I saw one skip pass all game, something Hiltz is a wizard at.
At least seeing Corsi and Birtwistle play well made me feel better about next year.
The zone offense did look better against Cornell than they did in previous games - Curry had an excellent pass to Buttermore on the inside of the zone but the Cornell goalie made a nice save. Frustrating to say the least see the offense look near impossible to stop against another top 10 team (Army is the other I am thinking of) but get slowed down by a zone. Given that they were up by a good amount, and the zone is meant to slow the game down, I wish they had done a better job of killing clock. Cornell should have been the one losing their cool, not SU.
The mic picked up Petro's huddle, he was giving very clear directions but the Orange players did not follow them. The game was lost on a hesitated slide a minute after Petro told them specifically not to hesitate, just go. Players failed to execute there. I don't think Petro has been great but I wouldn't blame him for this one
Corsi and Birtwistle can both sling it and should have played more the second half. Corsi was out there a few series but SU needed to make more moves agains the zone. Sit Berkman and put Corsi at attack to help open things up. Thought SU finally got a good feel for the zone late but Curry and Cordes both hit the pipe and Dordevic missed on a few looks he usually buries. Thought Buttermore got caught in between a few times, passed up some real good looks I want him taking and as you and others noted spacing was an issue at times as well.
The problem with being patient against the zone is that Cornell went on a quick run so the lead was almost gone hallway through the 3rd so we couldn't just kill clock and shorten the game had we still been up 5 or 6.
Defensively I thought individually (save for Murphy) SU matched up pretty well. Why we kept trying to double the ball is beyond me. Multiple times it led to Cornell swinging the ball for an open look. I just don't get it. Murphy also should have sat, at some point you have to try something different, disheartening to leave him out there to get abused by Piatelli. I know Gavin has taken some heat but both goalies honestly have struggled when asked to make elite level saves. Gavin had a few big saves in the 2nd half but hasn't been able to make the "wow" type we saw a few years ago. The bigger issue for me is the defense overall. Odd that we would have one of the best goalies in the country two years ago and he would fall off the map last year. Did Drake have a down year or did the D fall apart in front of him? This years struggles by both Gavin and Thompson lead me to believe its the D overall but both goalies have also shown an inability to take over a game.
Going back and thinking about the game again, I thought there were actually a handful of well times slides but overall I agree with your point of questioning a lot of the attempted double teams. I keep wondering is it a symptom of guys not trusting their teammates? Or is it part of the system they are running?
Watching the MD/Rutgers game the other night I was really focusing on Maryland's defense and I also thought they were sliding earlier than they needed to, but I think that's just how they run their system and they just play together so well as a unit. That's where Syracuse needs to figure out the right harmony, they have a lot of good individuals out there but can they figure it out as a unit?
I think goalie play could certainly be better at times, but I think I mentioned it last night during the game and it's a weekly theme, this defense just gives up so many easy goals every game.
To add to this, in the third quarter we only won two faceoffs and one was the first one where Dordevic immediately turned it over in 10 seconds. That hurtsI think the context of what was happening in the game is important here. The D was rock solid in the first half. At one point when the half was almost over I think they only had one goal of legit 6v6 offense, and it was a low angle 1v1 shot off the dodge that gavin should have had. Then they go to zone and get some stops early, go on a run at the x, we throw out a couple signature dumb turnovers and offsides penalties, unfortunate shot clock resets, and suddenly the already fatigued D has been playing defense for almost an entire quarter. Harder to stay disciplined on slides when you are gassed. We set the tone early with physical aggressive D and then they had to just hang on for dear life because they kept on getting possessions. Cornell has a top notch offense with a lot of weapons. Phaup is unfortunately feeling the effects of taking all the draws this season. I doubt a fresh Phaup goes 50 50 at the x.
I think the context of what was happening in the game is important here. The D was rock solid in the first half. At one point when the half was almost over I think they only had one goal of legit 6v6 offense, and it was a low angle 1v1 shot off the dodge that gavin should have had. Then they go to zone and get some stops early, go on a run at the x, we throw out a couple signature dumb turnovers and offsides penalties, unfortunate shot clock resets, and suddenly the already fatigued D has been playing defense for almost an entire quarter. Harder to stay disciplined on slides when you are gassed. We set the tone early with physical aggressive D and then they had to just hang on for dear life because they kept on getting possessions. Cornell has a top notch offense with a lot of weapons. Phaup is unfortunately feeling the effects of taking all the draws this season. I doubt a fresh Phaup goes 50 50 at the x.
Could not agree more about getting more fogos in.The TOP in the 3rd quarter last night was certainly a factor. I agree this defense certainly has quarters where it looks coherent and formadible and then there are times were they look lost. Hard to tell watching on TV but maybe they have to many communication breakdowns at the worst times?
Regarding Phaup I think you are right on. I know possession is important and he's your best guy but it's crazy that the staff doesn't run someone else out there 4-5 times a game. This was my complaint with Desko ever since Ben Williams arrived and I guess it's just going to continue with this staff too.
Its a tough call. Last year we did it with Varello a solid amount, even more in 2019 when they were almost even. We had that year in 2018 where it was Varello and the occ transfer whose name escapes me. I think its a situation where if you truly think your number two guy will not win the faceoff, then probably best to not run him out there. With phaups usage I'm more ticked off that we couldnt land a solid enough back up fogo this year. I assume if Savage was the equivalent of Varello in 2020 then we would see some action from him.The TOP in the 3rd quarter last night was certainly a factor. I agree this defense certainly has quarters where it looks coherent and formadible and then there are times were they look lost. Hard to tell watching on TV but maybe they have to many communication breakdowns at the worst times?
Regarding Phaup I think you are right on. I know possession is important and he's your best guy but it's crazy that the staff doesn't run someone else out there 4-5 times a game. This was my complaint with Desko ever since Ben Williams arrived and I guess it's just going to continue with this staff too.