Random stuff:
Whether we are a “top 10 program” depends on the criteria. Basically, that’s going to be an arbitrary, contrived set of characteristics by a fan, toward including the program they favor.
Can‘t really assess the recruiting skills of the current assistants, because they have had to recruit into a JAB program. One can say that should be easy because he’s in the HoF, but that’s not likely as significant of a ‘plus’ as a lot of people want to believe. Relationships, personalities, trust, playing style, opportunities, the school itself, etc… make a difference. Getting NBA-bound kids to jump into a zone-only program, under a guy who ‘just watches’ practice from a catwalk, rips you off the court for a single mistake—whether it was really yours or not, and doesn’t relate to you as a person unless it’s absolutely required… that all changes if Red becomes HC. Recruiting changes, and it’s possibly going to be down to demonstrating who we are going to be for a year to show the next round of recruits that they can be excited about playing for us again.
I don’t think there’s real meaningfulness in saying an assistant “isn’t qualified” because they haven’t been a Head before. In those terms, no one is ever “qualified” for any promotion. Having the qualities to succeed should be the bar, and it’s guesswork for just about anyone, because the context is different from wherever an outsider may have succeeded in his past.
JAB indicated we’d be trying some M2M, but as noted upthread, I’m hoping that is a premeditated transition move, or at least gets our staff involved with passion with learning/re-learning how to coach it. I have a feeling, though, that the Lemoyne debacle rears it’s he’d again, JAB goes ballistic with every point scored against it, and it is short-lived next season, but he’ll be able to say, “See?”
”Iron clad plan” and JAB specifically saying he’s coaching “next year” would seem to mean next is the last, but I’ve been burned before, so I’m just going to stop speculating now, and try to wait it out. I don’t expect great results from next year’s team, but just the drastic change will make it interesting for a while. Hope we get Mintz, as he could be a difference-maker. I don’t have a good sense that relying on Joe to create plays and feed the freshmen is going to be effective. Mintz, on the other hand, could be the dynamic player that makes the entire offense better and will help to extract the athleticism from those newbies who may not operate so well in a slower, more stilted scheme, where the fallback is too often a fallback three from Joe, after he’s unable to get by anyone.