TNIAAM wants us to play 3 cupcakes and lower level P5 team? I have no problem scheduling 3 easier OOC games per year but scheduling 1 challenge game is not what is holding back SU FB. We have lost talent now we are adding talent back into the program. However we should not schedule like Kansas State, Texas Tech, Rutgers.
Booo.
Here's a few of their recent articles on the subjectTNIAAM wants us to play 3 cupcakes and lower level P5 team? I have no problem scheduling 3 easier OOC games per year but scheduling 1 challenge game is not what is holding back SU FB. We have lost talent now we are adding talent back into the program. However we should not schedule like Kansas State, Texas Tech, Rutgers.
This is a bad take.
It is a joke if we go 4-0 in OOC and play 4 cupcakes and go 2-6 in conference play that is program building? No its just being mediocre.That's so weak of Keeley to just expect SU to avoid P5 teams altogether.
yeah, how could puny little Syracuse possibly expect to compete with a Big 10 program a mere 5 seasons from now :bang:
You can look at 2013. They went 7-6 after losses to Penn St and Northwestern and a win against Wagner.It is a joke if we go 4-0 in OOC and play 4 cupcakes and go 2-6 in conference play that is program building? No its just being mediocre.
If we go 3-1 in OOC and then 4-4 in conference we would be what we deserve 7-5.
Haha, good point. If it's still inwinnable we are all screwed.yeah, how could puny little Syracuse possibly expect to compete with a Big 10 program a mere 5 seasons from now :bang:
why even bother if you think this is unwinnable 5 and 6 years in the future?
I agree but in 2013 we went 2-2, 4-4 for 6-6. I think we need stop scheduling multiple P5 in 1 year so we can go 3-1 and be 3-5 to make a bowl.You can look at 2013. They went 7-6 after losses to Penn St and Northwestern and a win against Wagner.
Haha, good point. If it's still inwinnable we are all screwed.