- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,179
- Like
- 195,260
NCAA is all bark, no bite, when enforcing NIL rules against recruiting inducements | Toppmeyer
NCAA enforcement is slow, its rulings are inconsistent, and it lacks subpoena power. That makes the NCAA’s saber-rattling on NIL deals laughable.www.tennessean.com
The NCAA's ruleset is that kids can't be paid to simply attend a school. Period. There has to be some consideration they are giving in return for the NIL. In the cast of the Texas A&M linemen it's participation in a Not for Profit campaign (which is a crock of BS but creative by their boosters none the less).
The issue with the NCAA isn't the rules - like everything it's enforcement and consistency of enforcement. And since I suspect they won't enforce a thing, then the practice becomes the rule at that point. So in effect you're both right.
Exactly. There are a few facts that some people want to deny.
The NCAA has long considered boosters as representatives of a university.
The original NCAA NIL policy said NIL cannot go to recruits.
The updated policy recently reaffirmed that NIL can’t be used for recruits.
Those 3 things are indisputable facts.
The thing that isn’t a fact and is anyones guess is will the NCAA investigate and punish the cheaters.
All I’ve ever said is that NIL for recruits is illegal per NCAA policy. Fact.